Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Now all of sudden we're okay with it because games are trash now anyways so who cares?
As for the Ai gimmicky, it is nothing like what the consoles usdd and if you don't like it, get ready to not upgrade or play any big AAA games in a few years time.
Like it or not, it's the future and has already improved monstrously in the past 5 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La4EdRPT_Mg
wait till he dives into it...
5090 is at best 30% faster than a 4090 in raster performance. in reality maybe 10-20 fps more. the improvements are in ray tracing and frame generation at the cost of massive input lag, so even tho the FPS counter says 200 FPS the mouse inputs feel like 50 FPS. At least the visual fluidity is nice, but it certainly doesn't feel high FPS when moving the mouse around. Good thing the 4000 series are getting the DLSS4 image quality improvements. Future of gaming is 10 FPS with framegen X20. I wonder how much FPS the 5090 gets in Indiana Jones at maxed settings no frame gen; the 4090 can barely get past single digit FPS...
Good card for deep learning, not so much if you need a card exclusively for gaming
NVIDIA Reflex 2 with its Frame Warp technology will also provide significant improvements in CPU-limited scenarios. In VALORANT, which will also support the technology soon, on an RTX 5090 that can run the game at over 800 FPS on the RTX 5090, latency is reduced to an average of under 3ms with Frame Warp, which is extremely impressive.
It might have a higher MSRP but it's actually worth it, considering everything it has to offer, they could've charged even more and people still would've paid it.
All AMD had to do was keep focusing on raster but instead they managed to blow for a long time they could not catch nvidia in raster and now when nvidia ditch raster AMD stop the high end its a COLLUSION and a scam run by two cousins
The benchmarks suggest 9700 XT now beats the 7900 XTX in Ray Tracing. but falls down in between the 7900 XT and XTX when it comes to Raster performance, which ultimately still is not bad for around the $500-600 range it will be going for. This now makes the 7900 GRE and XT pointless once the 9700 XT becomes readily available. The 7900 XT is still a beast in its own right. But also keep in mind, with 9700 / 9700 XT its RDNA 4 based and that means exclusive FSR 4 Multi-Frame-Gen support.
Stop spreading rubbish.
The cards come with adapters which are perfectly safe to use and there is no more risk.
The most at risk part is the 12vhpwr where it plugs into the card and that's the same with or without a pcie 8 pin convertor.
Heck people have been using them just fine for several years now, there is no reason to out abd buy a new psu, so please stop repeating this rubbish.