All Discussions > Steam Forums > Hardware and Operating Systems > Topic Details
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Jonzuk Jan 22 @ 11:06am 
on black ops 6 i couldnt even tell i had frame generation on but from 20 fps to 200fps i bet you will notice lol mine now i on the RX 6800 with FSR frame gen and it goes from like 120 to 200 and its barely noticeble but sometimes the overall picture feels and looks weird like you can tell AI is present hard to explain. Overall imo bad direction to be heading in for something as trivial as real time path tracing... OLED 1440p monitor makes a 2009 game look better than the new indiana jones game on Ultra on a 4K 240HZ IPS screen
#1
Citizen Cook Jan 22 @ 11:14am 
Originally posted by jonzuk:
on black ops 6 i couldnt even tell i had frame generation on but from 20 fps to 200fps i bet you will notice lol mine now i on the RX 6800 with FSR frame gen and it goes from like 120 to 200 and its barely noticeble but sometimes the overall picture feels and looks weird like you can tell AI is present hard to explain. Overall imo bad direction to be heading in for something as trivial as real time path tracing... OLED 1440p monitor makes a 2009 game look better than the new indiana jones game on Ultra on a 4K 240HZ IPS screen

Nvidia’s new 50 Series is said to be a significant improvement over previous attempts at frame gen and reducing input lag. I suspect “fake” frames aren here to stay and that in few years time it’ll be impossible to play the latest and greatest AAA games without it.
#2
Andrius227 Jan 22 @ 11:18am 
Well they are making faster and faster monitors so frame generation is the only way to keep up. I think i saw a video about 480hz monitor and i think we may reach 1000hz in a few years at this rate...
#3
PopinFRESH Jan 22 @ 11:27am 
Originally posted by Andrius227:
Well they are making faster and faster monitors so frame generation is the only way to keep up. I think i saw a video about 480hz monitor and i think we may reach 1000hz in a few years at this rate...

https://rog.asus.com/articles/gaming-monitors/rog-swift-pro-pg248qp-intro/
#4
ᶻ𝗓𐰁 Jan 22 @ 11:50am 
Originally posted by Andrius227:
Well they are making faster and faster monitors so frame generation is the only way to keep up. I think i saw a video about 480hz monitor and i think we may reach 1000hz in a few years at this rate...
What's the point if it looks janky? Even an unstable 45-55 fps looks smoother than a frame generated 60. Stable v-sync 30 is smoother than both.
Last edited by ᶻ𝗓𐰁; Jan 22 @ 11:50am
#5
Guydodge Jan 22 @ 12:17pm 
im guessing 4 to 1 frame gen is going to suck in any fast paced game.in casual games
(non shooters) wont be an issue but then in a non fast pace game is low fps and issue
anyway.from what i understand it will be adjustable so a 2 to 1 FG should really help
the lower end cards with minimal adverse effects.using it within reason i think its going
to be a good thing.we'll have to wait and see.adding 16frames would be an idiots doing
cant even see how that would work on paper let alone implementing it.
#6
A&A Jan 22 @ 1:08pm 
Somebody has to add additional FG inside the monitors.
This is getting rediculous already. They should add FG inside the display port.
Last edited by A&A; Jan 22 @ 1:19pm
#7
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Hardware and Operating Systems > Topic Details
Date Posted: Jan 22 @ 11:04am
Posts: 7
Start a New Discussion

Discussions Rules and Guidelines