安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
first reason is resolution and second is refresh rate.....both are set by the monitor and really dictate what hardware you need behind it to get to the performance level you could be after.....
4K is doable on the budget BUT it will mean faster hardware upgrades......1080p at this budget would give you years of gaming without issue but would really be a waste of the hardware....1440p is a great middle of the road but again given budget you could go with a ultra wide......
so the real question starts with what resolution and refresh rate would you like to hit.....then really finding a monitor and GPU that will run that monitor and then based on those 2 target a CPU to not bottle neck the GPU......
case, power supply, memory and SSD's will be factors but small ones.....monitor GPU and CPU are the trifecta you need to pin down for the rest of the system to fall in to place....
I already have a monitor, I have the LG UltraGear 34 160hz ultrawide (my notebook doesn't even support 4k games other than Minecraft or with stretched resolution). I want to play with a considerably high FPS, not necessarily 160fps, at least above 80
This seems like the more expensive option, but may be needed.
It will be a balance of the GPU & CPU obviously.
One of the X3D chips definitely with one of the upcoming nvidia 50 cards.
The large cache helps a lot with the minimum frame rates. I have the 5800X3D & bought it for that reason. Nearly 3 years on, it is still doing very well.
I think it is all about the latency, specifically with the frame generation.
If managed well, then maybe a 9800X3D setup with as good a GPU as money allows. Turn on the frame generation.
If not so good, a cheaper 5700X3D setup with the saving going into the GPU. Turn off the frame generation.
Just my speculation & thoughts on this.
Of course there will be a much better idea when actual benchmarks & prices are out.
it never mattered about what the current laptop supported and real world with that budget you could change monitors....BUT it sounds like you have a good one so starting there
then i would go for the moon......you got 4090 budget and could even pay scalpers 600 plus on a 9800x3d and still be in budget......
I built a completely new system 5 months ago:
7800X3D CPU
ASRock X670E Pro RS Motherboard.
RTX 4090
32 GB Ram
5 TB's worth of NVMe SSDs
All cooled by a Noctua nh-d15 with 12 fans in a Corsair Air 6500 case.
Ultrawide 144hz monitor, mid to high level gaming mouse and keyboard
Got everything for just under £3300 by shopping for the best online deals. Just assembled it myself.
Not a thing it wont run....
Put it this way. Can run Forza 5 at every setting maxed and STILL get me 250 fps and dont even get me started on what VR sim pit racing is like with it.
---------------------------------------
Now thats a pretty much mid to high ranged price for the average Gaming PC. I know this.
BUT....
I built it with minimal failure, minimal maintenance and longevity in mind. Assuming nothing fails, that will serve me for years for gaming. Probably 10 years.
Just to put that in context, the machine I built prior to that was a 6700k I7 and 980 ti...which I built in 2016.
Call me crazy but I'd rather have a max budget and build the best I can that will last a long time rather than something I;d want to replace every 3 to 5 years.
Yes...better stuff will come out but as long as you can play and do what you want..whats the issue?
i think its amd gpu this year but im going off what ive heard in this forum, im too lazy to look unless im getting one mmyself.
as always, biggest asus motherboards (no mini stuff for your gaming), intel chips unless AMD is beating them bad that model year, noctua cooling stuff unless you need liquid then arctic silver V3 the goat. seasonic powered, they also make phantecs power supplies. MSI gpu is the only good one imo, asus gpu if you have to. RAM doesnt matter. buy $60 computer case so you can replace it every year savig you a lot of cleaning time. wired mouse and keyboard. more noctua fans. teamgroup ram, it matters a little. no hd, run 10 different linux live usb's. not really. raspberry PI monitor. not really either.
that went south fast
That is a lot of bad info formation.
About the only good part is a seasonic psu.
Nvidia has a big lead, especially with the 50 series.
AMD should be the cpu of choice.
Memory 100% matters and cheaping out is a mistake that can tank your performance.
Dont just replace your case, spend 10 mins cleaning it and a good (doesn't need to be expensive) case will let your system run cooler and perform better while having good filters gir easy cleaning.
Noctua is crazily over priced, ignore it unless you need a specialised cooler (small form factor), thermalright is virtually as good at 25% the cost.
As for the gpu, pick the cheapest model, there is very little to no difference between them these days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=010KyIQjkTk
Not sure what point you are making.
One is referring to ram speeds make a difference, the other is on how there will be very little difference between any model of a given ski given they all have the sane power limits.