Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Pravidla a pokyny k diskuzím
Nahlásit tento příspěvek
TL;DR pay up 800$+ and you are set. Anything below that and you are buying last gen with tomorrow's gimmicks.
I guess you're fine running low/medium @ 1080p; or simply don't play any demanding games or use your PC for any professional work; IT"S OK.
However I don't think AMD can get that right price because it is lower than what they'd feasibly do. $700 (current 7900XT price) would easily trade blows with the 5070ti although that $50 might not be a large-enough gap to justify going Radeon for a lot of people.
Plus we have the dishonest 5070 "4090 performance for $550" bs that Nvidia pulled and may have to wait for the benchmarks to roll out before AMD can really make headway at that price bracket.
If that is true it may be stronger than the 5070Ti but at a lower price closer to the base 5070.
And if FSR4 is any good then yeah, AMD may actually be able to compete.
Especially if AMD wait long enough and the reviews will compare them to the real market prices of Nvidia GPUs that will most likely will be much higher than MSRP.
You can't count on anything AMD says either. I remember back when Vega was coming out, AMD was attempting to advertise it for 4K Gaming; and that didn't go well. Now it's just a "meme" that many seem to have forgotten.
How much longer can Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA keep talking out of their rear ends before the Court systems see something strong enough for a class-action law-suit. Like when ATI had a class-action law-suit for saying certain GPUs were HDCP compliant when they were not. But yet what these Tech Companies are doing up on stage when showcasing products is no different then how Auto-makers have been lying for years (decades even) about Vehicle emissions, trip distance per tank (aka MPG/KMPG), or now with EVs regarding trip distance per charge.
"NOT A CHANCE!" Links a rumor.
You say that as if the 60 tier cards aren't the most bought price range with the 70 tier cards follwoing,
This is like the nonsense people keep touting saying if the 90 tier card doesn't have a match AMD has no hope for sales.
Like, bruh. 1% of card sales mean nothing.
Lol its not even close to the same. Nvidia claims the 4090 is x4 the performance of a 3090ti and its not even double and they barely get anyone to talk about it.
AMD says they offer a 1.7x jump from the 6950 and its a 1.5x and they get racked over the coals for it TO THIS DAY.
Not even close to the same treatment.
Many seem to forget oh so quickly...
3090 Ti vs 4090 comparisons @ 4K (2160p 16:9) (NO FSR / DLSS)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTxIJgx0pxU
However, if you were using the 4090 for AI related tasks, it was a beast.
When you compare the price to performance ratio AND power draw; the 4090 wins.
But by how much?
This is why it's probably a good idea to invest in the better GPU of the current gen, or pick up last gen GPU once its pricing drops. Then only upgrade every couple of gens. Someone who still has a 3080 Ti / 3090 / 3090 Ti now and happens to be using that mostly for gaming, generally speaking probably won't need a new GPU until the RTX 60 series. Depends what all they wish to do and if Gaming is all they need that GPU for.
Why did you link to a nameless fake benchmark? Theres plenty of real benchmarks to link to.
https://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/dominic-moass/nvidia-rtx-4090-founders-edition-review/all/1/
https://thepcenthusiast.com/geforce-rtx-4090-vs-rtx-3090-ti-comparison/
No its a faceless nameless fake benchmark. I literally didn't even bother looking at the numbers because it wouldnt matter either way.
Did you really just get your feelings hurt because I pointed out a crappy source?
You just posted 2 real sources right now so what made you post the fake one? What made you get mad and defend the fake one?
Looking over the numbers yeah, the 4090 is still no where near 4x the 3090ti like Nvidia claimed.
So no idea what your goal even is at this point.
Where are these claims about 4X performance anyways? Like I said, who cares what AMD or NVIDIA says. Folks like Elon Musk and Microsoft say alot of stuff too, only the sheep believe it.