安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
where I agree with your stance not everything need to be free when you consider the amount of effort that is require to maintain an OS
I'd doff my hat to the Linux community if i had one :)
And I don't think I can think of anything else where so much time and effort is dedicated to create a free OS for people anywhere in the world.
That in it's self is amazing gift from amazing people.
There are some distros like Red Hat which cost money but they're a niche, nobody wants to pay for an OS. At least, people that can actually use their brain and understand how pointless it is to wait for and pay for SteamOS.
It will a great gift for those who want steamOS3 and I agree there is no need to wait for steamOS3 if your willing to try something different and learn new things along the way.
It's basically Stockholm Syndrome at this point, no matter how many times Microsoft pisses people off, they keep coming back for more.
no consequences be it government or private citizens.please tell me why this would not be the case ? seems to me the door is left wide open.and what makes it so impossible that this is not case ? yeah you dont get adds but what you may be getting is far worse.just a thought.
I wouldn't know how secure Linux is compare to windows I only really use my PC for gaming it not used for banking or any important use cases, it's just gaming really other than I rarely watch stuff on youtube but even that has become less and less plus the odd bit of web browsing.
But for people who use their computer for banking or keep sensitive info stored on it I wouldn't know how good or secure Linux is compared to windows?
Quite the opposite. The GNU project has had a focus on security for far longer than Windows has, and as the saying goes, more eyes means fewer bugs.
I remember the old PC vs Mac commercials mocking Windows' then-new UAC popups back with Windows Vista, but Linux permissions and Sudo and SELinux and AppArmor were around long before Windows started enforcing such things.
In any case, something like a third of the entire Internet is run off Apache servers, so you can bet vulnerabilities are jumped on pretty quickly.
That's good to know and hear but are there there not any antivirus that work with Linux because if there is then maybe use a third party anti virus and VPN to help with the ever growing threat malware posses
not sure if there is an Anti virus or VPN that runs on Bazzite (arch)?
I did read the other day ClamTK has recently been discontinued due to lack of willing support and time so will no longer be updated or supported by the Dev.
well I say recently i think it was back in March of 2024 I thought ClamAV was maintained by or was the same as ClamTK but I think you would know more about that than me.
Because Windows is "Open it up and go."
Linux is "Do all this stuff and also there's something called packets and Proton and Wine and a bunch of other stuff because you need to."
Alright yeah cool. Windows is popular because it's ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ brainless. Linux needs a "Brainless" OS. SteamOS will be that OS.