What is a good CPU to go with the 5080?
It doesn’t need to be the best cpu, just good enough to not bottleneck it, and play games well.

Something went wrong while displaying this content. Refresh

Error Reference: Community_9708323_
Loading CSS chunk 7561 failed.
(error: https://community.fastly.steamstatic.com/public/css/applications/community/communityawardsapp.css?contenthash=789dd1fbdb6c6b5c773d)
< 1 2 3 4 >
Showing 1-15 of 54 comments
13600k
_I_ Mar 11 @ 6:51pm 
depends
low res high fps = fastest cpu you can get
high res = any cpu
Originally posted by _I_:
depends
low res high fps = fastest cpu you can get
high res = any cpu
1440p
Originally posted by Clumsybeast:
Originally posted by _I_:
depends
low res high fps = fastest cpu you can get
high res = any cpu
1440p
13600k
Ryzen 7 7800X3D, 9800X3D or if it`s too expensive 7700X, 9700X.
Would avoid 13th gen Intel like a plague with all their issues. 12th gen is ok and 14th gen should be mostly patched.
Jatimu Mar 11 @ 10:00pm 
Originally posted by Yhorm:
Originally posted by Clumsybeast:
1440p
13600k

thats a really old cpu, why would you even suggest it?



Originally posted by Rumpelcrutchskin:
Ryzen 7 7800X3D, 9800X3D or if it`s too expensive 7700X, 9700X.
Would avoid 13th gen Intel like a plague with all their issues. 12th gen is ok and 14th gen should be mostly patched.

I'd also recommend the 9800x3d or something more on the high end side, so you don't botttleneck your gpu, just dont go with the 200 series from intel as it is much worse than the current amd chips.
r.linder Mar 11 @ 10:14pm 
Would ideally be best paired with an i9-14900K or i7-14700K as those are realistically the best gaming CPUs overall -- when you actually look into benchmarks deeper than just FPS averages and pay close attention to lows and how often AMD CPUs experience harsh dips in comparison to competing Intel CPUs.

There's good reason why competitive gamers and cafes still use Intel, it's more consistent and stable.
Carlsberg Mar 11 @ 10:51pm 
Originally posted by r.linder:
Would ideally be best paired with an i9-14900K or i7-14700K as those are realistically the best gaming CPUs overall -- when you actually look into benchmarks deeper than just FPS averages and pay close attention to lows and how often AMD CPUs experience harsh dips in comparison to competing Intel CPUs.

There's good reason why competitive gamers and cafes still use Intel, it's more consistent and stable.

Currently, the 9800X3D is the best on the market, Intel has no equivalent.
r.linder Mar 11 @ 10:58pm 
Originally posted by Carlsberg:
Originally posted by r.linder:
Would ideally be best paired with an i9-14900K or i7-14700K as those are realistically the best gaming CPUs overall -- when you actually look into benchmarks deeper than just FPS averages and pay close attention to lows and how often AMD CPUs experience harsh dips in comparison to competing Intel CPUs.

There's good reason why competitive gamers and cafes still use Intel, it's more consistent and stable.

Currently, the 9800X3D is the best on the market, Intel has no equivalent.
There's more to gaming performance than average FPS, the 9800X3D has larger performance dips (1% and 0.1%) from average FPS than the 14900K, which when overclocked alongside RAM can easily close the gap and beat it.

Competitive gamers and gaming cafes switched back to Intel because AMD has disappointed them consistently with how inconsistent and unstable their chips are in terms of actual performance.

So you're just spouting whatever YouTubers are telling you without understanding any of it, and bar graphs don't show you how often AMD has frame drops in comparison to Intel.
Last edited by r.linder; Mar 11 @ 11:00pm
Carlsberg Mar 11 @ 11:20pm 
Originally posted by r.linder:
Originally posted by Carlsberg:

Currently, the 9800X3D is the best on the market, Intel has no equivalent.
There's more to gaming performance than average FPS, the 9800X3D has larger performance dips (1% and 0.1%) from average FPS than the 14900K, which when overclocked alongside RAM can easily close the gap and beat it.

Competitive gamers and gaming cafes switched back to Intel because AMD has disappointed them consistently with how inconsistent and unstable their chips are in terms of actual performance.

So you're just spouting whatever YouTubers are telling you without understanding any of it, and bar graphs don't show you how often AMD has frame drops in comparison to Intel.

I won't dispute what you say but accordingly reviews are saying its exceptional despite the issues asrock, msi and some other mainboards have had. Intel, well,.. they have a well earned reputation for reliability especially in the business world and they will not want to lose that.

PS; just for the record, I have NEVER taken any youtuber bs for a reference.
Last edited by Carlsberg; Mar 11 @ 11:21pm
r.linder Mar 11 @ 11:38pm 
Originally posted by Carlsberg:
Originally posted by r.linder:
There's more to gaming performance than average FPS, the 9800X3D has larger performance dips (1% and 0.1%) from average FPS than the 14900K, which when overclocked alongside RAM can easily close the gap and beat it.

Competitive gamers and gaming cafes switched back to Intel because AMD has disappointed them consistently with how inconsistent and unstable their chips are in terms of actual performance.

So you're just spouting whatever YouTubers are telling you without understanding any of it, and bar graphs don't show you how often AMD has frame drops in comparison to Intel.

I won't dispute what you say but accordingly reviews are saying its exceptional despite the issues asrock, msi and some other mainboards have had. Intel, well,.. they have a well earned reputation for reliability especially in the business world and they will not want to lose that.

PS; just for the record, I have NEVER taken any youtuber bs for a reference.
Reviewers are being biased as usual, if they were actually good at what they do then they'd actually test and report things properly.
ugafan Mar 11 @ 11:49pm 
Frame Chases has been highly critical of the "AMD dip". Here is a link to his video on the 9800x3D.



His conclusion is basically:
For the mainstream consumer who wants plug and play: 9800x3D
For the max tuner who is going to tinker around for a month: 14900KS

So even though he has problems with AMD, he still recommends the 9800x3D for people who aren't going to spend lots of time tuning.
hawkeye Mar 12 @ 1:08am 
Originally posted by Carlsberg:
Originally posted by r.linder:
There's more to gaming performance than average FPS, the 9800X3D has larger performance dips (1% and 0.1%) from average FPS than the 14900K, which when overclocked alongside RAM can easily close the gap and beat it.

Competitive gamers and gaming cafes switched back to Intel because AMD has disappointed them consistently with how inconsistent and unstable their chips are in terms of actual performance.

So you're just spouting whatever YouTubers are telling you without understanding any of it, and bar graphs don't show you how often AMD has frame drops in comparison to Intel.

I won't dispute what you say but accordingly reviews are saying its exceptional despite the issues asrock, msi and some other mainboards have had. Intel, well,.. they have a well earned reputation for reliability especially in the business world and they will not want to lose that.

PS; just for the record, I have NEVER taken any youtuber bs for a reference.

Regarding the "reputation for reliability especially in the business world" comment, just the way that you write indicates that you don't really know anything about professional IT. I've never heard anyone use the term "business world". Plus I have never heard anyone talk about reliability.either. hat is just mumbo-jumbo.

And here is the big one - in the "business world" as you call it, no-one uses windows except on end-user laptops etc. And then the hardware is always SOE and is a low-end cpu for "global warming" reasons.

The discussion here is about gaming pc's, which has nothing to do with what happens in professional computing. Different cpu families, different hardware architecture, systems usually I/O bound etc.

And has been stated above, fps is used in gaming reviews as it is simple enough for the average gamer to understand.

I know a few popular youtuber reviewers. In the their real jobs they are school teachers. The information they provide is useful and usually reliable but none is applicable to corporate systems.
Last edited by hawkeye; Mar 12 @ 1:16am
A&A Mar 12 @ 1:36am 
Certainly the biggest bottleneck with Ryzens is the infinite fabric, but that doesn't mean they're bad processors.

6-8 core CPUs right now (doesn't apply to Intel 200 lol) or a previous generation or two are still doing fine.

The 12th generation intel is dirt cheap and considering the 13th and 14th are the same as the 12th but with additional cache and e cores and there is speculation about Bartlett Lake, it doesn't seem bad.

Ryzen 7000 is not bad either.
Last edited by A&A; Mar 12 @ 1:45am
Originally posted by Clumsybeast:
It doesn’t need to be the best cpu, just good enough to not bottleneck it, and play games well.
You can't avoid bottlenecks. They are a fact of PCs.

That being said, the answer to your question is pretty much the same it always is; buy the best option that fits within your budget at the moment. So what's your budget?
< 1 2 3 4 >
Showing 1-15 of 54 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 11 @ 6:41pm
Posts: 54