Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I think their all time low was earlier than that, Nvidia almost went bust until saved by the Riva 128, Riva TNT range many years ago.
And Nvidia was only just trying to have a "hey look at this gimmick you MUST HAVE US!" thing (♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Splintercell shadows).
It wouldn't be till after they bought Ageia that things got stupid.
All in all I'd say number one is buying what ever gamed best on your dollar. They both ran fine even with ATI's shady Quake3 "optimizations". I'd still go Nvidia back then though if I had the scratch as they not only had a better lokkin driver program but they also supported transparent Windows UI elements, a but load of other features and I believe even virtual desktops if I recall.