安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I think they're missing context when trying to use their single-threaded rating when involving the X3D CPUs (this works just fine when not involving them, though) for the reasons I gave above, but otherwise they're using a non-biased source and not giving bad information here. It's not like they linked to Userfraudmark or something.
mine rarely goes above 70f while gaming with a 4090 running 1440 so its using it
more than running at 4k.and E cores enable me to run anything along side while gaming
and more and more games are taking advantage of the E cores.stop listening to fools.
its clear you dont understand the power and capabilities it gives you.
The 5800X3D is a great buy if your on AM4, the 7800X3D, not so much.
Likewise fir Intel, the 13900k/s while being the fastest, is not the best buy, that goes to the 12700k or 13600k for most people and the absolute fastest makes very little difference in gaming.
But, that you use sources who pretty much run hardware stock, perhaps you should now out of conversations on maximum performance?
Look, you clearly have never looked into the tuned numbers on both platforms, so, perhaps walk away until you know what you are in about and aren't just fanboying for the processor you chose to buy.
Once more though, I will reiterate that for the vast majority, either option is fine, however, the more consistent fps on Intel tends to be a better experience overall, atleast id prefer less stutters from fps drops over an inconsequential gain in max fps in a couple of games, if you leave the platforms at stock.
Oh i understand the power alright, Its through the ROOF. In the UK and EU 13900k costs a lot to run. The 7800x3d costs less uses less power less heat and can win in some scenarios.
Lol
So 78003d is future proofed for 10+ years ? Good to know,thanks for that.
its a very common issue with AMD cpu's.
also, you are wrong about it being faster, seriously, stop the fan-boying and giving out miss-information and go look into how the chips perform when set up properly.
the 13900k isnt that hard to cool, i ran it in my htpc with a thin noctua nh12-s cooling it for a couple weeks lol
Don't worry OP, you're cheats will still work with either one to keep you getting those boom headshots ;)
Trash value, trash stability, trash early adopter nonsense, trash uefi, trash bulging with poor thermal management, trash xmp support. I could make a huge list about that fail of a platform but I'm going to go play starfield on my fx-9590 and give your am5 a huge
Later 💪
Look up the sheer running cost of the 13900k in the UK its bonkers its over TWICE the 7800x3d if im not mistaken. Its only a few fps faster in the cs engine. But your paying a lot in the electric bill and the difference in cost. Id wager the saving of £400 long term over 10yrs.
The smart build is a 7800x3d and put the 400 saving into a 4090. Thats my plan for my 500hz cs2 pc ive bought the 7800x3d already i could of got any cpu but i specifically chose it for my needs as a uk gamer.
That issue was solved and a final bios issued in june i think. Being a fanboy isnt smart and while amd did have problems uve stated stuff thats irrelvant. Cost fps and power use is relevant intel lose nearly always in all 3.
By running them at stock in an non optimal state, you don't get to see how either side actually works.
Go look up frame chasers videos, he actually fully tunes both sides to the limit to get the maximum performance out of them.
Running Intel on slow ram fir example is sandbagging it just because AMD cannot handle it.
AMD is also only cheaper after no one bought 7000 series chips because they raised their prices so damn far.
Plus, the AMDip is real, in many games.
AMDip?
The x3d chips cache is very impressive and out of the box the AMD offerings are superb tbh.
But, when tuned properly, they lose out to Intel, some people do not like hearing the truth so just throw benchmarks done by those with non tuned or overclocked systems with very bad testing methodology as some kind of 'proof'.
As I've e also said though, both teams are more than good enough for 99% of people.
That's not to say you can't point out tweaked stuff. But it's not applicable to the vast majority of people so using results that are applicable to most people isn't dishonest. Those who have the finances to buy the top CPU and GPU to then warrant spending up on RAM and be willing to push it as far as it can go probably have plenty of results they can reference for that stuff. So I don't see the problem.