Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
so a monitor would be a waste of money surely, at the end of the day its up to whoever is buying it, but it rather get a top model 1080p monitor and put the rest towards a better gpu
I'm a professional programmer too... Man that was way easier than 4 years of school.
In regards to the actual subject(Not the AMD vs. Intel one) I'd say going with the GPU is a better upgrade now. Everyone should wait on 4k monitors.. We should all know by now thatjumping on the newest technology is foolish. In 1 year 4k displays will be much cheaper, better built, and easier to use with many different setups. If anyone out there chooses to suggest you upgrade to the newest technology they either A) have more money than they know how to spend wisely, B) are a complete idiot who constantly jumps on every new bandwagon to be "cool", or C) they don't have the technology they are so quick to suggest.
BTW... Why do you need 4k? I have a 1080P IPS monitor, and it looks so good to me that I'm 90% sure I'm not going to 4k in at least a couple of years.
Plus, it will save money too since soon all the new gpus will be designed for 4k, meaning that 1080P will be nothing for graphics cards of the future. Just 720P is now.
I don't need it. It would just be nice to have. The new Samsung panel is great regardless of it being a TN panel. I'm not one to care if it is TN or IPS. But 4K gaming is nice so I think it would be a good luxury buy.
It just is not there yet and I would wait until better GPUs arrive.
If u are in need of a better GPU now to play well @ 1080/1440p then I would just get a good low/medium budget GPU that suits your needs for time being. Then when 4k is really an affordable option and more in on the market, then upgrade to much better high end GPU, such as GTX 880 or something along those lines. NVIDIA 800 series should be here before 2015 rolls around.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1184?vs=1056
please scroll up, the 690's are NOT $1000. they can be had for cheaper than the 290x.
ok lets use an example where AMD has an advantage. BF4, the 690 is overall ~10fps faster than the 290x bear in mind this is THE game for the 290x and was designed with it in mind.
pricing wise a 690 can be had for £400-500. i bought mine new for £400 last autumn (around the 290x launch) and the 690 is cheaper and faster. Now granted the 290x can be had also for about £400 but it is still slower, uses about the same amount of power, runs much much hotter, noisier, plagued with low build quality issues.
This will replace the standard PCI-e 16x (16GB/s) slot on the motherboard with their own 80GB/s NV-Link, allowing for up to 5-12x greater performance bandwidth. Which will help greatly for true 4K.
DDR4 will also be released, replacing the DDR3 and doubling it's bandwidth while using lower voltage.
New motherboard will be required to work with most of this.
Win 9 will replace their crappy Win 8, with a smaller, cleaner, patched version which supports DirectX 12, etc. 100% of all DirectX 11 graphic cards from Nvidia will support Direct X 12. AMD however will only be about 33%, most of that going towards third party Mantle drivers instead, 12% being real DirectX 12.
Nvidia drivers currently on BETA greatly outperforms Mantle. They work at a hardware level, more than just software based. This means up to 71% performance boost in a few of the current graphic cards, mostly around the GTX 700s series and also with SLI setups.
Real 4K monitors for PCs should be released around this time, instead of UltraHD/4K (half true 4K) and a Nvidia Pascal card should be able to run them all smoothly or have tri-monitor setup just on a single card without the need of SLI. Game support will also be increased around this.
So your best bet is to wait off on the 4K and move to using Nvidia for best gaming performance and future proofing. AMD has given no idea in what they have planned or holding off on. However, Nvidia is actually currently holding back their good stuff, reducing the size and power usage currently. Expect the low end stuff to be released first.
NV 400 series supports DX11, but NVIDIA said that only GPUs dating back to the 500 series would be elegable/capable of DX12 support, when it arrives officially.
It is unclear though if Win7 will get any sort of DX12 update. Win8.1 however will get such an update, and Win9 will have this built-in and ready from the start. Some would suggest they might leave Win7 out of the mix from getting the update, but Vista originally only supported up to DX10 and then they patched it to support DX11, so IMHO I don't see why they'd leave Win7 users hanging in the wind, but again can't know til we reach that point in time.