Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
I initially was hyped about dual-booting, but the further I've thought about it, the more unattractive it became. Because most games I play are either native to Linux or work well with Proton already, having a bulky, unoptimised OS on limited hardware is just a waste of resources. Unless the new SteamOS turns out to be a complete privacy nightmare, I wouldn't even install another distro.
But again, Linux is mostly fine, especially if they manage to sort out the incompatibility with certain anti-cheats. The crux for me is Xbox Game Pass.
If this global pandemic that is currently going on will ever settle, that is
Your understanding is wrong. Windows is better for gaming than Linux, and change of OS can't magically increase the game performance. Game performance depends mainly on hardware you have (aka CPU & GPU). And Valve can't optimize anything. They just put things together ( aka hardware and software). Only the individual game developers can optimize their games, to work better on some specific hardware (like we have seen in consoles).
Just remove Steam OS, install Windows. Install Steam Client. Play games like a normal desktop Windows PC on Steam Deck. ALL games supported.
Unless your friends network have active directory as a mandatory requirement, I fail to see what other networking issue you can face with a Linux OS.
What is better for gaming is purely personal preference.
- If you consider compatibility with modern games important then Windows is better.
- If you consider compatibility with older games important then Linux is better.
- If you consider performance important then it will highly depend on the games in question.
- If you care about having an non-intrusive operating system then Linux is the clear winner.
Game performance is highly dependant on drivers. You can have the best hardware available, but if you combine it with poor drivers you will still have something useless for gaming. Try running a 2080 Ti under Nouveau, then tell me again that only hardware matters.
Valve has a team working on AMDGPU and MESA. AMDGPU is the open source AMD graphics drivers in the kernel, MESA is a collection of open source graphics API implementations for AMD hardware among others. An example of a major contribution done by Valve and it's partners would be ACO, the Amd COmpiler, it is a shader compiler which became default in MESA 20.2 replacing the LLVM compiler. It yielded significantly better shader compile times and a nice performance boost.
Another example of what Valve and Collabora are working on is a Linux kernel module called FUTEX2 superseding the old FUTEX, it can be used by WINE and Proton to improve Windows game compatibility.
Yeah, I suspect they REALLY changed it a lot to get it damn better.
I'm more pissed at them not showing any infos on the etched glass.
No, that depends on the game. If you look at benchmarks some games actually do perform slightly better on Linux, even if they are using Wine or Proton. But also, this is a hardware with its own custom-taylored OS. It is possible that it's a little better for things like I/O, the controller might have lower latency, that sort of stuff. Not that it would be a huge or even very noticeable difference, but still.
Again, depends on the game, so this is a yes.