Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-ryzen-7-3700x-ryzen-9-3900x-review,27.html
Ps, even my 2700x hangs around 4.1ghz during gaming with the stock Prism cooler.
Some day I'll get that ^ for mine, I've never been a fan of water.
Besides, doesnt the 3700x have a single core boost clock of 4.4 anyways?
Precision Boost Overdrive voids your warranty, and tries to sustain higher boost clocks for longer periods by raising power limits, but it's broken so normal PB is often better for Ryzen 3000, and it voids your warranty because it's unsafe.
TSMC's recommendation for their node is 1.3v, the Silicon Fitness (FIT) usually has a safe limit of around 1.325v. PBO is simply not good for the longevity of the CPU, it's better that people get the best OC they can at ~1.3v. Not to mention that boosting in general is pretty awful because it wastes a lot of it; my 3900X can run at much higher clocks at 1.3v all core than it normally runs in an all-core load at 1.3v stock.
Hardware Unboxed managed to kill their 3900X sample by overclocking it and using too much voltage.
1. The all-core frequency can outweigh the boost on a single core because it's consistent, boosting for 3000 is just all over the place so it needs CPPC Preferred Cores to work even remotely decently.
2. It's in a single-core load. Most of the time you're hardly going to see your single core boosting to its maximum.
There is a point, really. Stock and PBO aren't necessarily safe for the chip longevity because it's letting the CPU use much more voltage than it should. Chances are, people could have issues because their chips are using too much voltage.
What voltage? Anything above 1.325v on all cores is not recommend for any all-core OC, and for TSMC's 7nm node, 1.3v is the flat limit. Anything more can easily degrade the silicon.
TL;DR
Regardless of what people thought was the best course, your best bet is in fact finding the best clocks you can get (all-core or per ccx) at ~1.325 volts. It's often going to be more consistent in heavier loads, you'll usually get better clocks than auto at the same voltage, and the higher single core boosting is not worth pumping excessive amounts of voltage into the chip, especially in high current loads.
My 3900X is running 4.3 GHz on CCX0, 4.4 on CCX1, 4.1 on CCX2, and 4.2 on CCX3, at 1.3v, and it performs much better under load and uses less voltage as what would be giving about 4.1 all-core at stock in an all-core load.
You are definitely causing a lot of harm to your chip at that voltage, you need to dial it down a lot.
If you set the all-core to 4.2 GHz without setting voltage, you could be seriously damaging your CPU. You can actually kill the chip by doing that if it overshoots, HWUB did it with their 3900X.
most am3 were good to around 1.55v
The tools to use for a CPU OC is BIOS, and in the case of Ryzen, Ryzen Master can be used as well.
If people actually care about the longevity of their Ryzen 3000 CPU, they should be running the best clocks they can at 1.3v to protect the lifespan of the chip. I've ran overclocks above 1.325v and my chip has never been able to sustain it for long; overclocks that I had no problems running for months suddenly stopped running stable and was never able to boot at those settings again.