Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
http://www.ncixus.com/products/?usaffiliateid=1000031504&sku=81358&vpn=RL2455HM&manufacture=BenQ&promoid=1215
1 ms response time 24" gamer monitor.
Also, the difference should be negligible between the two.
You should be fine with anything less than 16ms on a 60Hz panel. If you're going with something that has a higher refresh rate you'll want a faster response time.
Link 2 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236358
Both are in my budget, on sale.
If you guys have any recomendations please post link.
It's $148.50 with promo code and additional $20 off with rebate.
If you can afford that Benq I listed then it would be better though.
6ms at 120+hz will be blurry
60hz = each frame is displayed for 16ms (monitor takes 6ms to change pixels, its displayed correctly for 10ms)
36% changing, 63% correct
at 120hz = each frame is displayed for 8ms (if the monitor takes 6ms to change pixels, it will display the correct image for 2ms)
75% changing 25%correct
on a 60hz monitor, 5ms and lower is better
on a 120+hz monitor 2ms and under is better