Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
1000Hz is great for gaming purposes.
For simply sake: Lets say you have a 120Hz monitor running at 120 fps. Updating the mice location 1000 times (1000Hz) means it gets updated 8 times per frame. 1 out of 8 is used, and 7 times are just waste. However, it gets pretty accurate that way since the mouse location is always fresh. As long as your computer does not slow down, and if 1,000 is the default, there is not much reason to lower the rate. It's basically just telling it how many times to check, so long it's not crazy low vs what you can see on screen and react to or the other way around and too high for older slower systems to handle, then it's not a problem.
This is how it would work for a gaming mouse, keyboard would probably be the same type of idea...
If 1 stands for 1000Hz, then that should be more than enough.
Although this can make some huge difference in mice (and should always be maxed out unless an issue), it is largely irrelevant for keyboards unless you can type faster than a few milliseconds? 1000Hz is most likely the highest to go, as more is just wasted anyways (unless you have 1000Hz+ monitors and micro-millisecond reaction time).
Logically guessing, it would be for your keyboard:
Divide 1000/#
Therefore...
8 = 125Hz
4 = 250Hz
2 = 500Hz
1 = 1000Hz
Setting it as '1' would be your best option, if 1000Hz. It's highly unlikely and not even required to go higher than this. You would only care about reducing it if the system can't keep up with it (which should be fine for a high-end system anyways).
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3092563/all
Nice find - but to confirm (it's not 1/2/3/4 on that list, it's 1/2/4/8). The polling rate calculations, however match.
8 = 125Hz (that would be a polling rate of 8 millisecond - marked as 4 on that list)
4 = 250Hz (that would be a polling rate of 4 millisecond - marked as 3 on that list)
2 = 500Hz (that would be a polling rate of 2 millisecond)
You would want it on '1' (1000Hz - 1 millisecond), unless compatibility issues.