Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
consoles are designed to run games at 30fps 1080
monitors can go alot higher and gaming at 60-144hz looks so much better
at console prices buy a console, it will play all games desgined for it
else spend $600+ for a good gaming pc that can handle 60fps at 1080p
Cost. I made the same calculation back when they announced the new consoles; should I spend $400 to replace my 360 or pu $400 into my PC?
I went the latter route and got a GTX 970 for TW3.
It's a totally arbitrary self-imposed budget, but it's a pretty decent framing device to give yourself context for the purchase. Especially since, like the OP, I already had a computer I could upgrade instead of replace.
@OP, the CPU side of your APU is good enough to play games for now, but as soon as DX 12 and it's OpenGL counterpart (or Mantle, whichever is going on on that side) starts getting integrated in games, it is going to be pretty useless.
It'll be the bottleneck of almost every game as it is right now, but once games start heavily relying on the CPU when the above happens, your A10 is going to struggle a hell of a lot.
So keep in mind that in six months to a year, no matter what GPU you get right now, you're going to have to replace that CPU. If you went with a higher end AMD chip you'd be pretty well off.
(To the other tech people here, the lower singlethreaded performance relative to Intel will mostly be mitigated by the higher multicore performance once games start utilizing actual cores better)
Would I need a HDMI to DVI adapter cable? I don't think I do but the only reason I ask is because Amazon said people frequently bought an HDMI to DVI adapter cable with the monitor
if you want HDMI then you need one, DVI is good enough I don't see a reason to get an adapter
Ok, thanks. DVI is good enough for me
Just get an extra external usb hard drive to save all the junk that you don't need immediate access to all the time.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-budget-gaming-pc-guide
The build was tested to almost match the PS4:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxUPJdcChzE
For more context, in my Laptop I have a 480GB SSD split into two main partitions. On the Data partition, I have 9 AAA games (L4D2, Portal 2, Metro 2033 and LL Redux, Sleeping Dogs definitive Edition, Sniper Elite 3, STALKER CoP, TW3, and Tomb Raider 2013).
Three of those are open world, most of them are very high in hi-res texture count, and all but one of them larger than 9GB is size.
On top of that I have roughly 30GB of music, pictures, documents, and the like (no videos, though).
All told, of the 367GB of my Data partition, less than half of it is being used. I have just under 200GB to store more games.
It's totally doable to store quite a lot of games on a 500GB HDD, it's just a matter of staying over the !5-20% free space window needed to make sure your drive can access things fast enough to not slow down.
But the tradeoff is way less space for documents, pictures, and music. One of the reasons my computer has as much space as it does is because I painstakingly went through and deleted duplicate files, unnecessary files, and found ways to reduce file on-disk size (I put installers in a zip file as soon as I download them, and make sure there aren't any obsolete or duplicate installers there, for instance).
You can't just move and forget when you're dealing with constraints like that. A ton of extra space could be freed up for more games if you put the time into it, but a lot of space could be wasted if you don't.
Here's a good option that will (by the official specs which recommend 400W) run on your PSU:
EVGA GeForce GTX 960 2GB SuperSC ACX 2.0+ Video Card
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/evga-video-card-02gp42966kr
NCIX US $194.99 -$20.00 In stock $174.99+
$20.00 mail-in rebate
The GTX 960 is better than the PS4 GPU and the rest of your system is already up to par. However you may want to get a larger HDD and maybe a SSD or just a SSHD instead of both.
The specific card I recommended is 10.12 inches long so you need to make sure there is room in your case for that length. If there is not you can either get a shorter and more expensive version of teh GTX 960 or you can just buy a bigger case for cheap. Tell me if you need further advice on that.
You could probably technically also run a R7 260X or maybe even a R9 270 as they are 115W and 150W while the GTX 960 is 120W. So if the GTX 960 runs on 400W then the R9 270 could probably run on 430W without a problem. I think the official AMD specs 9while they still posted PSU recommendations before they stopped) were actually 450W and 500W but their estimates might just have been higher than Nvidia's cause they wanted a more generous margin of safety or some extra room for overclocking the GPU and the CPU likely also. I do believe in your specific system (until and unless you start adding lots more upgrades or overclocking the CPU a lot) that the R9 270 would run just fine for now.
Either a R7 260X or a R9 270 is likely to be cheaper. The R7 260X will be a worse card and the R9 270 should be pretty similar in performance though in some cases better or worse.
Here's the cheapest R9 270:
Gigabyte Radeon R9 270 2GB WINDFORCE Video Card
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr927oc2gd
Newegg $159.99 -$20.00 +$2.99 s/h In stock $142.98
$20.00 mail-in rebate
Again a 10 inch card so you need to make sure it will fit.
Here's a cheap new full size ATX case that will fit either of these two cards no problem:
Raidmax ATX-402WB ATX Mid Tower Case
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/raidmax-case-atx402wb
Newegg $39.99 -$15.00 +FREE s/h In stock $24.99
$15.00 mail-in rebate