Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Nowadays, it's restricting apps' behaviors as I simply want to cut down on unjust enrichment by these mega-corporations. But the prevailing belief sometimes is: yes it's "free" but payment has to come from somewhere." And ultimately it's the appearance of the targeted advertising that has me taking extra steps. No. Way.
A more recent thing was Avast and its data-scraping scandal. Remember that one? Stuff like that is way more of a concern nowadays. And security companies are getting ransomed--a big one very recently. We need to be mindful but not paranoid.
1. Clean the junk/temp files
2. Edit startup
Everything else I don't even touch. been this way for like ever. So I ran it just now and said "let me see what's up with this and what all it can do at this point".
lol. The gui is like a maze and most paths lead me to a dead end. Most features lead you to a point where you have to buy the pro version or you need to have internet connectivity (and seems like stops responding for no internet or for whatever other reasons). I might replace it soon with something simpler and more effective. I always knew it was somewhat bloated, just haven't really felt like messing with it lately.
I'm not even trying to be creative with anecdotes to shoot down your suggestion of using CCleaner. I suppose in the world of bloated programs, it's not worse than anything else out there. Probably one of the better things. It's just that experience they went through that got me.
I really wish they'd update Speccy
The FUD comment was more about registry cleaners as a whole. Many first page posts are about how dangerous they are and how they will break your systems. This is validated by linking to a post from MS that is very obviously just a CYA for them in the event of something going wrong to say "well, it was never recommend". Its far from what I would call damning of the concept, more a legal boilerplate disclosure.
Meanwhile reg cleaners, and the concepts of registry de-bloating and general OS maintenance, are things that have been widely supported and shown good for system health since the late DOS and 9x days. Its a generally safe practice, albeit like all, one that has pitfalls. And in general its better than not to do more so with long-in-place installs with large changes over time.
I find it not unique coincidence that some of the ones who recommend full system wipes regularly and claim windows slows down and gets bloated over time in other threads in the past just so happen to be some of the same ones advocating for a "let windows manage itself and dont mess with it" approach. Letting windows manage itself and not keeping up on OS maintenance is exactly why they feel/see a need to wipe.
The need is there, but only due to lack of action up to that point. Unmaintained windows turns into an unusable mess in about 1-2 years with most users who dont keep up on it :/
You used to be able to opt out of the trial entirely and download a base .exe of the limited version without any of the pro crap included at all, but now days (as with most companies including MS with our own OS's) its all about the Ad's.
If there were a more readily available and trusted utility with comparable features I would jump in a heartbeat, but as is its the best once you get over its labrinth of bs UI.
That said, I dont use it for much now days as I have another service I use which is paid and has these same style features as a seconadry bonus to the paid version.
Also, if your OS is Windows 10, then just ditch Norton and stick with Microsoft Defender. Norton used to be great, long ago. Not anymore.
Why is it that you think removing a few unused keys in the reg database will in ANY way help keep Windows running good?
Do you know what the reg database even is, and how databases work? Go look it up!
By "cleaning" the registry, only result is that you shave off a few kilobytes of storage space. You don't gain a smoother running OS by deleting unused data.
Also, there's no need to re-install Windows regularly, Windows can take care of itself year after year.
I stopped using it. Not when the controversies started coming out (but that prevented me from returning) but before them. I increasingly felt it was unnecessary and I found myself launching it less and less and eventually uninstalled it.
I don't have to reinstall my OS due to not cleaning the registry regularly, nor does it slow down on me. I don't know what people are doing to feel a reinstall is so necessary or a casual step to take (it's really not), but not cleaning your registry regularly isn't a thing that causes you to need to reinstall the OS. I did occasionally have to reinstall Windows XP way back when though, but I'm not sure if I attribute that to registry cleaning I was doing back then or not (most likely it was other stuff, but this is one possibility).
It seems like you're unlikely to catastrophically break something by actually cleaning it (though the risk is probably there), but you're also unlikely to gain anything from doing.
Few questions for everybody.
First: How big problem is "86 registry issues" from all 3 million subkeys? (Note: These 3 million subkeys are from clean install of Windows 10 Pro 1607 with Office 2016, l don't know how many he/she have but l am sure it is a bigger number.)
Second: How these "cleaners" understand where your keys or values are not working? Asking because they can tag something as unnecessary when it's actually important which can cause from breaking program to breaking windows.
Third: We are not in Windows 9X era where when you have big regestry, your PC slows down. With the newer versions we have better optimizations for the regestry. Why we have to worry so much? If yes, then why we have to waste our time?
What once could affect your machine's performance years ago, is now a negligible issue today?
Norton are full of s**t?
I'm not sure registries ever affected pc performance. I know I used it though because when I first started using computers I had such a crappy pc that I looked for anything under the sun software wise to try to compensate for it's sluggyness. I'd defrag, use ram boosters, disk cleaners, internet boosters, anything I could find that would supposedly optimized my pc. Then around the XP days the problem was real and I continued doing the same thing but I think that was because the problem was that everybody was shoving those browser addons and real bloatware onto your pc even with prebuilts. I remember that program called "PC Decrappifier" or something. But nowadays that doesn't happen plug hardware is a lot better so it all equals out to just better performing pcs and if there is a problem it's usually a serious bug in an application that won't be solved by those AIO pc optimizer things.
I've also realized Norton was full of crap even since the XP days but the rest of the world hadn't caught on. I think around when Windows 7 came out that Norton was really dropped by the world and I started suggesting Avast, Antivir, and AVG.
These days you're one of a handful of people still even considering them I think. I'm sure there's people who still use it, but they probably haven't learned any better yet.