安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
There may be some bottleneck from the CPU but overclocking it should help a little. If you are coming from the onboard APU graphics, there will still be a massive improvement in FPS, even if the CPU does bottleneck slightly.
its a good match for the cpu with fast ram
if you plan on upgrading to an i3/i5 build, go with a gtx 960 or better
Try and get the A10 up to 4.3 - 4.5GHZ, this will help reduce any occuring bottleneck.
Thanks again for being so helpful :D
You can get around any NVidia bottlenecking by overclocking your CPU using the FSB and boosting your RAM speed.
As for build above, I''m thinking a dual graphics setup with a 2GB R7 250 or a better and dual graphics compatible R7 300 series would give plenty of GPU power, at least for those games that supported it. Could you OC the iGPU to bring the clockrates somewhat closer to that of the R7 250, like the 7870k does (866MHz)?
As for the advantage of going discrete GPU, it would allow you to OC the CPU more; but you would waste those iGPUs and the good effect of that together with the fast RAM. With the current power supply and the OC-ing, would it be good to go with a GPU rated under or at 150W?
You can usually adjust the iGPU clocks to match a low end card but going for a card like the 960 will give much higher performance than a dual graphics solution.
Try 250x18 or 225x20 for a 4.5GHz OC rather than a straight multiplier OC.