Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
E.g. Seasonic 750 can do nealy 1000 watts at load for up to a minute at a time.
The requirement says 300W. That is what you should have.
http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=187
label says 78a on 12v rails, but it pukes at over 46a on them
Completely different from short-cutting on system requirements when attempting to install a GPU upgrade.
It's irresponsible to propose ignoring the recommended manufacturer specifications / requirements. Following that kind of advice is how to void warranties and damage equipment - or worse, if a component catches fire.
* low power, apu or pentium g/i3 under 50w
and 1hdd/ssd and not many accessories or usb devices
Seriously, _|_, we've disagreed on a lot of things in the past, but this is ridiculous.
you can run it on a lower psu if the build is very low power
recomended is to be able to run the specific hardware on a maxed out sytem with an overrated psu
ex. diablotek 300w thats only capable of 250w max, and a system containing fx9 220w cpu
The recommendation is what the equipment is designed to achieve. Or in the case of the GTX 750, the amount of wattage required to safely operate the equipment.
First of all, bad example. That situation would never exist - the computer probably wouldn't even boot.
The GTX750 has a 65W TDP and a recommended power supply requirement of 300W. Here's how a build might break down:
Intel Core2Duo E-8400 - 65w
Platter Hard Drive - 20W
Motherboard - 20W
CD drive - 20W
GTX 750 - 65W
Let's say the user wants to add another platter hard drive, for another 20W.
We're looking at 210W. That works, right? By the numbers. (these estimates are very rough, and will vary greatly by system)
But there are other elements in play. At 250W, the user has 40W of leeway. There is still dither and brown-outs to account for, like for instance in the summer when everyone has their air conditioner on. Which is why the recommended 300W allowance provides a greater "cushion" to handle inclement draw / supply. Companies test for this (the good ones do, anyway), they evaluate for it, and I'm pretty sure their engineers know more about it that I do. It's arrogant to assume the opposite.
Even if running a GTX750 on 250W psu would work, that does not mean it is safe or advisable. And when in doubt, it is always better to NOT circumvent the parameters a manufacturer specifies. Otherwise, you'll only have yourself to blame if something catastrophic happens.