安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
For the GPU you'll probably get a couple years out of it, though you won't be maxing out games with only 2gb VRAM.
As for the CPU, I would suggest going the i5 route nowadays, for the recent stuff, 4 real cores are better than two. That said, I reckon you'll probably get another year out of it and at least it isn't a Pentium. There are some games now that those cannot even launch. In most cases the i5 4460 is cheaper than the 4440 by the way.
I noticed you said in an earlier post that you render videos. That will usually benefit from a quad core.
If you want to try AC Syndicate, give it a go, as you can always get a refund if it doesn't run.
Have you considered the R9 380 also? Usually priced the same, but is a faster GPU in most cases. Might be able to find a good price on a 4gb version.
What software do you use for editing and rendering your videos? If its Vegas or Premiere Pro, an i5 or similarly priced Xeon E3 (these are i7s without the onboard graphics) would be a benefit here.
As for the GPU, r9 380 is much worse than GTX 960:
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-380-vs-GeForce-GTX-960
Plus that GPU is available here for the price of GTX 970, which is also much better not only than the R9 380, but also the GTX 960:
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-380-vs-GeForce-GTX-970
its not fast enough to make use of 4g
will allow for higher settings, but its not strong enough to hold 60+fps at settings thst would require 4g of vram
Don't compare the specs of a GPU, compare the performance. For most games, the 380 (especially the 4gb version) is faster. The GTX 960 is still a good card though and will play games just fine.
However, the 380 isn't worth it though if its priced same as the GTX 970 in your area though, that is much faster than both 380 and the 960.
If you want a GTX 960 have a read of this:
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-discontinue-2gb-versions-geforce-gtx-960/
If this does happen, the 4gb models should hopefully go down in price. It might be worth the wait.
I'm actually perfectly fine at gaming anything above 30FPS, especially if it doesn't go below 20FPS.
Yes, That's why I'm not going for anything AMD, because they are very expensive in India for some reason :/
It also isn't sensible for too many games to demand ridiculous specs as they will target too small of a customer base, which is why the games come with such in depth video settings.
I will probably purchase Fallout 4, so a day or two after release you can message me and see how I run on different settings (but there will for sure be youtube videos of this type of thing popping up).
Problem is for some, if you get too used to 60fps, you'll most likely have trouble adjusting to anything less, then all of a sudden 30fps feels unplayable.
Anyhow, you'll still get a good few years out of your GTX 960, particularly if you don't have a problem with dropping a few settings. As for the high requirements of games, I would guess the devs do that to cover themselves should people with lower end hardware start complaining about performance.
Yes, I agree with the 60FPS problem! People do get addicted to it. I'm playing many games (watch Dogs, Crysis 3, Far Cry 3 etc) On medium at 20~30 FPS, and whenever I launch any Source Game (Half Life 2, Black Mesa etc) I get 60FPS and it looks sooo smooth, and I can't game on 20FPS for a week! (Because it simply seems so laggy and stuff) but after a while I get used to it! So I guess it's safe to say that the GTX 960 will live on for 2 years at my resolution and run everything at high at +30FPS. Then maybe I'll start reducing the settings, but hey, 2~3 years is enough time for me!