安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
As a whole, IPS displays have slightly more response time, which means they are more likely to blur and ghost.
IPS displays are built good these days, so you will get low response time anyway.
Meaning no matter what you get, it's going to be fine.
Just buy a decent monitor, and you're good.
20+ms = ghosting with any moving image
<2ms = sharp image with moving objects
To find a really good IPS panel, you'd have to really look for reviewers that properly test the response times, because the advertised response times are misleading since it only applies to when the screen is displaying a single color or shade.
Most 240+ Hz panels are TN.
At this point, there's only 2 reasons to opt for TN: it's the cheapest, or you're after extremely fast refresh rates and response times that IPS can't do.
that you wont notice (5-7ms is fine)
,and backlight bleed and panel glow(these last 2 can ruin a ips monitor LG
is notorious for BLB) still would be my pick,but you may end up in a RMA circle trying to get
an decent one with no to little BLB
TN panels are cheaper with faster response times and much deeper blacks as ips are washed out in the blacks.the colors on TN panels while not as accurate can be more than acceptable
and if you calibrate them can look pretty decent.asus,dell and benq have dialed in their TN monitors.
as far as motion blur that has more to do with the specific monitor be it upper end or lower
end models.
go watch some hardware unboxed videos on youtube they have many videos on budget monitors
I am thinking about the Lenovo G Series G25-10.
Looks great has 1ms response time, with TN panel.
There is no monitor with a true consistent response time of ~1ms. The only time it ever gets that low is when the screen changes between two colors (GtG). This never applies to typical usage. It's manufacturers just setting the field for advertising faster looking numbers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHOb523rNBw&
TN is a rather pointless niche because you can get an expensive IPS with fast response times and really high refresh without the ugly look of TN. You just have to pay more, but it's worth it for a better looking gaming experience.
IPS used to be a lot slower but it's usually as fast as TN these days, just about.
If pixel response time is below the update rate time (hz) then there will be no ghosting. If it's above it whill ghost.
60hz is 16.66ms, 120hz is 8.3ms, 144hz is 6.9ms, 165hz is 6ms, and 240hz is 4.1ms.
So for a 144hz monitor, make sure response time is below 7ms.
(Note, not marketed response time, get the actual number from a reviewer like Rtings.)
I would argue that a monitor is the most important part of your build, you look at it constantly, doing any task, when using the computer. Buy something good, it'll last you a decade if not more.
Majority of VA panels I've seen are closer to 12ms.
Though with IPS, you have issues with BLB and glow.
Kind of anecdotal, but recently a friend went through 3 or 4 panels, all from different makers, because they all had horrendous BLB.
A couple were visable in daylight, it was that bad.
So, TN, while it has worse colours, doesn't suffer the issues of poor dark uniformity as badly as IPS.
I just want a viable OLED 'gaming' monitor, best of every world -- great colours, perfect blacks, low response time, and no BLB or glow issues. Should have higher brightness too.