Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Yeah my ram is not so bad it's new, and clocked at 1600. I just reapplied thermal paste on it, removed some dust, and clocked down the speed a llittle bit to prevent overheating, still faster than that 610m lol.
http://coderbag.com/Programming-C/Disable-CPU-Core-Parking-Utility
http://coderbag.com/Programming-C/CPU-core-parking-manager
Overall, in most cases an NVIDIA GPU of some sort will always be a better choice. As Intel HD 4000 and lower have issues with most games, not as much of the case with Intel HD 5000/IRIS series GPUs. But NVIDIA or AMD are better choice for overall DX/OGL compatibility.
but for ogl intel hd falls way behind
gt 610m is a very low end gpu, not gong to be any faster than intle hd at dx/d3d, but ogl will be a huge improvement
Yeah that's the program I used to unpark my CPU, since I dont have issues with intel on CSGO, I dont think I'll be changing it soon unless I want to play some Nvidia/Amd optimized game.
I rarely use Open GL and yep intel will my temporary choice. 610m is now the last few graphic cards on the list that nvidia still cares about, it is utterly low-end for PC/laptop platforms lol!
If you do go with a dedicated GPU, don't bother unless you are going to get something around; NVIDIA x50 series / AMD R7 260/370 series or better
Right. I don't want to do something with the dedicated GPU since it really heats up my laptop, and slow, as you said for now I only gonna use it when it comes to compatibility issues.
I already planned to get an APU system with DDR3-2400 ram for just 300 dollars, it's quite capable for budget gaming, since I mostly play CSGO and Dota 2.
It's going to run csgo above 60 on medium settings, so yeah I'm quite enough with it.
Anyways thanks man, you're the man.
Stick to Intel CPU/GPU + NVIDIA GPU combination.
Overall the heat is normal when using dedicated GPU; it's fine as long as it doesn't exceed around 90-95*C ~ having it run close to that while gaming is quite normal though, it's designed to handle it.
Yeah I know Amd always have higher temps.I am strict about temps, for anything above 65 is not acceptable. Anyways the APU system I've mentioned is a desktop, I'll be clocking down the speed so it will not exceed 60. I'm not planning a cooling fan because AMD's stock desktop cooler is actually better than intel's so If i'm going for an intel I might consider a fan.
Also my room is small if the system is hot I might turn my room into some sauna.
Here's the specs:
A10-5800k 3.8 Ghz clocked down to 3.5
ASRock Motherboard
G.Skill Ripjaws 2400 Mhz 2x4 GB
1 TB Barracuda
CX550M PSU
I won't be purchasing a mobile gaming solution anytime soon, because simply it's not effective enough, unstable in performance and expensive. Those gaming laptops out there is good enough to make a cup of hot drink. In fact even if the system is going to handle that, rubbers and plastics is going to melt a bit and the heat will cause your palm to be very sweaty and uncomfortable.
No matter if it's from intel or amd, gaming on a mobile device will not bring me an enjoyable experience.
However that's a whole other story with regards to Desktop hardware.
As the AMD desktop stuff pretty much tops out around 65-70*C; where as Intel is fine to around 80-90*C
Oh? I see. I learn new stuffs everyday. Anyways, for desktops I'm sure most of the PCs without overclocking wouldn't exceed 65 anyway so yeap.