Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
it will play but your going to have a lot of stuttering.....most of the 3000 series used chiplets and you have 2 with a shared cache....the cross talk between the chipllets will cause micro stutters and hitching in game.....the 5700x did not give me much of a performance gain but getting rig of the micro stutter alone was worth the 175 bucks for me....and i sold off the 3700x for 120 making the upgrade cost me 50 dollars.....FYI the 5700x has a single chiplet and not 2.....so no cross talk problems....
If you're only gaming, get a 5800X3D, otherwise get a 5900X or 5950X
So what I am getting is that if I dont try to run at 4k at 144fps I should be ok?
I would not waste the money on a higher model GPU if you're not going to increase your refresh rate or resolution
Not contradicting the others in this thread - the 4070 Super is capable of more performance at 1440p, and you should upgrade your cpu at some point. But if 1440p 60fps is your goal a cpu upgrade is not an immediate need.
Definitely
As someone with a comparable GPU (6900xt which is typically within 5FPS above or below the 4070s in many titles) and also has both a 3900x and 5950x (and 5600x GT) I can say you will be fine.
Even more so if all you target is 1440p/60 or 4k/60.
I have used my 3900x (and in fact am using it r/n as my 5950x is being RMA'd) for both 1440p/165 and 4k/60 and it does great. There are a very few titles where the 3900x struggles to hit 165fps but those are few and far between and were not the reason for my upgrade to the 5950x. And in most games the 3900x still outperforms the 5600x GT even if it has slightly faster IPC, simply from lack of cores now days which (contrary to what anyone here says) do matter in modern titles.
If you have any questions feel free to drop me a FR and DM and I would be happy to do some testing on the 3900x for you with my 6900xt, which again is spot on performance wise for the AMD comparable to the 4070s. Since I have it in service right now it would be easy to put some numbers up for you in any game I own.
If yuu *are* worried it might hold you back jump to the 5800x 3D which is good for anything up to and including the 4090 (my best friend runs that exact combo) or jump to the 5950x which is down to like ~350 and is also a great gaming chip, if a bit overkill just for games. Both should be a drop in upgrade for you.
Instead of worrying if they exist, worry only if you have performance below what you desire. If you do, that is the only time identifying a bottleneck actually matters, because you need to know which part to upgrade when you want more performance.
With a Zen 2 CPU, an RTX 4070 will be held back, but it's not enough in my mind to matter for GPU reliant things. Especially for 60 FPS. It would be more of a limitation for CPU reliant things, but that would also already be the case for your existing RTX 2080 Ti anyway, so... nothing changes really.
The point of an upgrade is to improve performance, not remove bottlenecks. It will do the first one, and you can't achieve the second one.
If you decide you want more performance later that the CPU is responsible for holding back, you can upgrade to either a 5700X3D or do a platform overhaul (somewhat bad timing for this one though with the 7800X3D being a bit overpriced, and LGA 1851 and Zen 5 X3D coming soon).
say a 1080ti or 3060 you should see a nice boost
https://youtu.be/boPD0qh0g4Y