Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
Procédures à suivre et règles des discussions
Signaler ce message
And which CPU from AMD to get depends on how many cores you need for your workloads, if the system is just for gaming then a 7800X3D is best, if it's for more for a workstation machine, 7950X or 9950X, and if it's a mix of both, 7950X3D (or wait for 9950X3D to release later this year or next year)
Bet. Thanks for the info. I'll look into them.
My start-up time is usually 20 to 25 seconds to 40 seconds depending on training. On my older i5 10400 it took 7 seconds to boot.
The microcode update is supposed to prevent the chip from applying excessive voltage on singular cores during turbo boosts. Processors already in service may have been permanently damaged through stock use if they were pushed too hard, but a new processor should be more or less fine, provided two things:
The first is that you applied the intel microcode update. The second is that you use intel default profile in the bios settings. Reviewer testing suggests that there isn't really much difference in new microcode perf. and old microcode perf., so new customers of raptor lake don't have to worry about this. You probably wouldn't want to buy a K sku raptor lake chip at this point in time since they can't really be pushed much harder than they already have been.
The second is some sort of defect with some application of an anti-oxidation coating to the V.I.As. during fabrication. Intel claims they purged the supply of processors with this physical defect from their supply chain sometime during 2023, but that some escaped onto store shelves.
They haven't given us a method of identifying what range of chips may be affected by this manufacturing defect. I would personally guess 14th gen. chips are less likely to be affected by this, if they are affected by it at all, since Intel knew about this in 2022 and they would have ideally fixed whatever the caused the problem before starting the manufacture of new chips. However, we haven't gotten a statement expressly confirming that, nor have we been given a method to know which precise range of chips might have the issue. I can hypothesize that 14th generation chips might not have suffered the oxidation defect, but I can't confirm it.
Given that Intel was knowingly selling potentially defective chips without making a formal announcement, and even refusing some R.M.A. requests puts trust in the company at a low, especially since they have refused to issue a formal recall.
1995 Intel issued a recall over their P5 chips over a minor division error that would have only affected a select few users who needed especially precise calculations[www.businessinsider.com]. Modern day Intel tries to sweep problems that lead to the catastrophic failure of the entire chi under the rug and pretend as if they never happened until they're caught red handed by Youtube's detective dept.
Failure rates of raptor lake chips were estimated to be at 10-20%[forums.anandtech.com], which is well outside any reasonable manufacturing tolerance. Maybe if Intel had been a little more honest from the start, an a little more wiling to accept R.M.A. or did issue a recall, just like they did in 1995, their reputation might not have taken such a bad hit. Mistakes happen sometimes.
However, as things have gone down it's extremely difficult for me to advise buying any raptor lake products because Intel has proven itself to be untrustworthy. Untrustworthy enough that I'm not even sure I believe them when they claim mobile and HX processors are unaffected by the bug. Even if Intel faces a class action lawsuit, if the company goes insolvent then they might not be able to honor their warranties. They're also an 80 billion dollar company: They also don't get to cry poor, even despite declining market share.
Even if you're a diehard team blue loyalist, lunar lake processors have been announced for October, and that's just about when we're anticipating arrow lake and arc products too. Nobody wants to be the person who bought tech only to have it rendered immediately obsolete. It doesn't really make sense to buy onto the problematic platform just as newer, better and likely safer purchases are just on the horizon. And look, even if rumors of new hardware come october end up to be false, you still have Black Friday by the end of November for anybody in a region which observes that practice.
If I were to buy onto LGA 1700, it would be for the alder lake chips, or maybe just wait until Bartlett Lake chips. We know those don't have problems because they would have exhibited problems first before the 13th and 14th generation chips. The 12600kf is also a pretty decent value chip, especially with the inclusion of Assassin's Creed Shadows (like it or not, a free game is a free game). However, I really can't advise buying into 14th gen chips at a premium over AM4 chips like the 7700 or the 7800x3D.
Plus I'm not sure what the situation with WIndows 23H2 and 24H2 is/url]. Could be that Ryzen suddenly gains an unexpected perf. lead or something that upsets all of the prior testing results we've been relying upon to ascertain where the chips land in the hierarchy.
Drastically reduced temps.
I bet the actual number is more like 5%. Thats why it took intel over a year to notice that anything was wrong. I mean its still bad, but nowheare near as bad as people think.
People are just fear mongering for no reason, or because they are amd fanboys.