Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
look up its specs to see what cpus it supports
and cpu support only means it 'works' but not at its rated spec
if its a weak vrm design, it will be throttled before he cpu can get warm
and with an older chipset may limit performance in other ways, lower pci-e rev or ram and/or other things
You also need to ensure Motherboard VRM can really support it since 9800X3dlD will have 120+ Watts TDP
If need be can always use the 9700X (65W TDP)
But you should be fine to use a 9700X after a BIOS update.
Otherwise just go for a 7800X3D
I'm not sure why some others think the Xx70 boards are needed for gaming. This isn't like the Intel platforms of 5 to 10 years ago where you usually did want the top chipset to get the most out of the K variant CPU, or to use RAM profile speeds to their fullest, and so on. The big thing the AMD Xx70 boards offer is more PCI Express bandwidth for multiple SSDs at one time... and yeah, that's not needed for gaming.
Many of the B550 boards were actually comparable or even a bit better than the X570 boards too.
With B650, I think many of the earlier/first generation boards were good, but many of the second wave ones were actually pretty mediocre? I'm recalling a Hardware Unboxed video on them when updated ones released and I recall many of them weren't that good.
B350 - mix of mid and outright cheap (in a bad way) motherboards with issues
B450 - mostly mid, some bad, basically none that were really good
B550 - mostly decent, some mid, some really good, a few unnecessarily good
B650 - some good, some decent, some mid, probably some bad
I recall also seeing articles where B850 was going to be cut-down a bit to the point of being closer to B450 in terms of quality and value, and B840 added as like the "new" low budget chipset (similar to the A series)
So AMD might be allowing their partners to put more focus into X670 and X870.
some really good some really bad
the a boards are all junk
kinda similar with the intel b, some good some bad
intel h are all junk
the intel z and amd x boards are mostly good or overbuilt
But otherwise, it's like you said. It's down to the individual board, not the chipset, on how good it is. The chipset mostly determines features, and the X series chipsets are by no means necessary for gaming.
B850 will be fine for most but X870 will probably take more of a foothold for people who take things too seriously and enthusiasts because they want people to pay more for motherboards.
On the other hand it never hurts to have a cpu with the best single thread speed available for games which only use a few threads. A lot of what a game does isn't fps related.
I believe that TDP shouldn’t be used for power consumption any more as it can be super misleading.
Intel 13900k has 125W TDP
Ryzen 7700 has 65W TDP
One of the most power efficient gaming CPU on the planet: 7800x3D has 120W TDP while consuming about 50W while gaming.
It’s just difficult to cool so has higher Thermal Design Power.
AMD also uses PPT
„PPT is a measure of the total power consumption of the entire CPU package, including cores, cache, and uncore components.”
7800x3D has PPT of 162W while having some of the lowest real life power consumption. About 30-60W when gaming.