Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
Diskussionsregler og retningslinjer
Rapporter dette indlæg
it'll work for games but you'll be upset that it wont run well on 99% of monitors and it'll be completely outdated within a few months
It's pretty pretentious to call yourself humble as well just because you haven't upgraded your GPU yet.
my next upgrade will be cpu since the fx 8350 is getting old
Insofar as I can tell, watching direct head to head comparisons, the RX 580 is basically stronger than the 1650 in nearly every games, even if you're just looking at a 4 gigabyte 580 as the basis of comparison to control for V.R.A.M. The fact that the RX 580 also comes in an 8 gigabyte configuration, with double the V.R.A.M. of the GTX 1650 is just icing on the cake.
You'd definitely want to get the 8 gigabyte RX 580 too. More V.R.A.M. buffer means less data transfers to the R.A.M. and/or disc, meaning you won't take perf. hits as often and will experience less hitching. We're getting to the point where people are saying 8 gigs. is just scarcely enough for 1080p anymore, so you really don't want to be stuck with just 4.
The main reasons you'd really consider the GTX 1650 is because for one thing, it's a newer card with mesh shader support which can be important for the very newest games like Alan Wake Ⅱ. However, I haven't seen the GTX 1650 or the RX 580 tested in Alan Wake Ⅱ, and possibly for good reason: The game lists stronger cards in the minimum requirements. Wants at least a GTX 1070 or an RX 5600, which basically renders this point moot.
The other is because the GTX 1650 is more energy efficient. With a 75 watt T.D.P., you can work a GTX 1650 into power constrained systems and have lower operational costs over time than the 185 watt T.D.P. RX 580.
A few months ago I did a power consumption comparison between the RX 580 and the 6500 XT though, and estimated that it'd take you at least 3 years to break even on the cost of electrical consumption and the price differential between the two.
Granted, that means that if you use your RX 580 for three years that you'll have been overall better off with a 6500 xt in the first place, since the 6500 xt is the stronger card between itself and the RX 580, and if you use the RX 6500 for even longer, you'll be saving money on total costs. However, that's also money you're paying off over time on your electric bill rather than all up front. However, if you're really worried about electrical consumption on a brand new system, you'd probably be better off building an 8600g based system using the integrated graphics.
An i7 2600k isnt a chip worth buying for use with modern games in modern systems. Even a relatively low spec. game like Baldur's Gate 3 lists the 4690k as its minimum requirement, and that's with a weaker card like the RX 470. A 2600k is probably going to bottleneck an RX 580 or a GTX 1650. You might be able to push Palworld, which lists an i5 3570k as minimum spec, since even though the 2600 is an older chip, it's a higher tier chip too, which may just make up for it, but I'm kind of doubtful. Minimum spec. is generally targeting 1080p, 30 F.P.S., lowest settings too, so we're just talking about what's barely acceptable.
Also, when you look at games that actually list something akin to an RX 580 in their system requirements you see it listed with stronger C.P.Us. than a 2600. Street Fighter 6 for example lists an i5 7500.. Way newer and stronger processor.
You're strongly preferring i5 8000 or newer chips since those are on the Windows 11 supported list but that wouldn't matter if you're willing to put up with linux, so we might be willing to compromise with something older contingent on price.
What's your budget anyway?
Look at 5000 and above.