安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Maybe others will have best advice, idk. I feel you though. I was on the same card until recently.
Best to save up to $300 for RX 6700 XT or 6750 XT.
Both are going to show slightly different results, which is actually good as they have different methodologies and likely different suites of games/software they test with. This just means that if you accept no particular amount of difference as the absolute, always guaranteed difference, you're good.
If you want to narrow it down further, Gamers Nexus, Hardware Unboxed, or some other text form websites that do reviews on a particular GPU can be searched for and added to the mix. The more data you consider, the closer to true accuracy your results should get.
As for your upgrade, the RX 580 is pretty close to a slightly better GTX 1060, it's a hair faster and has 2 GB more VRAM, but it uses a lot more power and doesn't have as good of modern day driver support. A new GPU at $200 is basically the entry level starting point for low end, modern performance, and that would get you an RX 6600 non-XT, which is better than the GTX 1080 (but not Ti) in performance, so it gives you an idea. nVidia doesn't have anything compelling new at this price point. You could expect a bit more performance if you go used. The 6600 XT you found is close to the GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2070 Super. At $125 that sounds fair.