Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
You will be most likely limited to games that can run in directx 9, maybe 10.
A lot of the games from the series you mention come from the days when Core 2 and early Core i series (think Sandy Bridge) and GeForce 8800 GT to GeForce GTX 200s were common in gaming, so your Intel HD 4400 might run them, but not well. The newer entries in the series, however, probably demand more, which is why Arkham Knight won't run, but Arkham Asylum did (I ran this on a Core 2 Duo E8x00 and GeForce 8800 GT back then). Being able to run Super Action Shooter 3 doesn't mean you can run Super Action Shooter 7 - Revenge Edition, for example. So I wouldn't expect to get Arkham Knight running. IIRC this may have been the one (it was one of them) that had a somewhat bad reputation for performance at the time. Might be a heavier engine or reworked rendering or something. L.A. Noire may work, on the other hand, but I'm not too familiar with it as I never played it much and dropped it before finishing it.
All you have is an officr/media laptop, nothing more. Can't even run Minecraft or Fortnite very well on that.
Considering both my similar but weaker laptop runs Minecraft fine, as does my even older Core 2 Quad and GeForce GT 1030 (but also the same with the GT 430), I'd say OP's laptop will run that game well.