Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
The one I had was some custom White box Pentium III platform using the baby AT (not ATX) form factor, so it was old even for that time. Those power supplies used a pair of connectors (1x6 pin arrangement each) that connected directly next to one another, and they could physically be plugged into either one. If you connected them wrong, the PSU, motherboard, and/or who knows what else was gone. And I happened to unknowingly do just do that.
The penalty I had to deal with because of that mistake was using an older Pentium 166 MHz/16 MB (or 32 MB, I forget) Windows 95 PC for for a couple weeks, and I actually bought my "new" (used) PC on eBay bidding from that. It was very slow to load Windows, a web browser, or do any page loads haha, but it was an experience I'll never forget.
If the bold is correct, then it would have happened regardless of what cooling you have on the CPU. The heat added into the case (from the CPU) is down to how much wattage it pulls, not how warm the CPU is operating in a given moment. The CPU being warmer is merely a byproduct of the heat it is creating not being transferred off of it and into the environment fast enough (which itself is a result of the cooler being incapable for the CPU).
Actually, if it was throttling, you were added slightly less heat than if it weren't throttling.
You can still use it with this cheap cooler, but you really have to sacrifice performance.
Nobody wants that
but its not good enough for newer cpus that can go to 200+w
im sure it did well, but at max load the cpu would be thermal throttling
for a similar price point the thermalright peerless assassin 120 is the new king
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/hYxRsY/thermalright-peerless-assassin-120-se-6617-cfm-cpu-cooler-pa120-se-d3
It just wasnt efficient.
Ecores and Hyperthreading disabled in bios.
I did what this guy did:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifko0dvmH2U
plus thermalgrizzly cpu hold down plate, 15mm fans above and below the air cooler. I've never seen over 84*.
My video below, on a B760 board with no VRM cooling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv7VIWZum58&t=312s
Now the so-called smart people will tell me I am wrong, even though I know better than them.
And that is evidence.
For the people pairing 400w capable CPU's with that kind of rubbish cooling, you had it coming to you.
Yeah I've tried that. My motherboard has a profile that disables the cores. It was a few degree difference but not anything meaningful, I also didn't notice much difference in fps but I didn't test performance much. Do you notice game performance improvement?
I'd be interested in messing around with that more IF theres a noticeable performance improvement. If I'm just gonna get 210 fps instead of 200 fps then not really worth it.
I ditched Windows and went Linux Mint "Edge" that supports that CPU and 4080 Super. Went from fans blowing like a jet engine to can't even hear the fans spin up at all. NO background AI running.
Now that's basically impossible to do on newer motherboards
Also when I was younger I didn't actually understand the concept of bottlenecking as much. Thought I could just update a gpu over and over.
Edit: also once I upgraded my ram from 256mb to 768mb with a 512mb stick. It still ran slightly faster but I mismatched the ram
Bottlenecking is grossly exaggerated these days.
And RAM being mismatched isn't optimal, but when it works, it works, and one could posit that if you needed more than 256 MB, then 768 MB running slower is still better for you than 256 MB running faster.
Running at slower speed did effect the FSB to also run slower, which could have real effects on performance back then especially, but how much would depend on various factors.
I'm presuming that was DDR1 as well, but in case it was SDRAM, it would have mattered even less since dual channel wasn't a thing for that.
be aware of many fake experts here, in this forum.
how to spot a fake expert watch?v=N1Sw8fe9hJI&t=20s
it is about guns but it does not really matter, works the same way.
how to spot a real expert watch?v=swUTCZXE6AY&t=396s