Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
running 1440 or 4k a 14700k will be good for years to come.easily handle a 5000 series
and you may be disappointed by the 5000 series rumor has it they are no better than the
4000 series just more energy efficient,we shall see.
4k it will remain that way for some time a 14700 would be a very nice upgrade for
a 4070 and with a newer and better card the 14700 will be a must.
with a 12700k and above theres no reason to upgrade be it amd or intel.
If you want to know if you can get more performance, then install something like MSI Afterburner and have it display your GPU usage. If your GPU usage is sitting at 97 to 100% usage the vast majority of the time, then a new CPU is not likely to offer more performance.
If your GPU is constantly dipping into the 70 or 80% range, then it is likely waiting on your CPU, and you could get more performace by either pumping up the graphics options (making the GPU work harder) or by getting a new CPU (that can keep up with your GPU).
lies....AMD is still the best option....the upgrade path alone makes AMD better.....but real gaming performance makes intel a joke.....its funny you cry about AMD shill when you proved your a intel shrill......
everything is equal at 4k and 1440p??? no child......
game either way being a up lift on either cpu.hes a shill because hes telling him to switch platforms even though a 14700 would be good for years to come with the same results
as changing an entire platform for no real gain other that to cause wallet drain.make that make sense.and a 14700 would be a nice upgrade from a 12400f
but 1440p or lower or older games at 4k, and high refresh rate displays will be cpu bound
top end amd cpus do have higher core performance than intels top lineups
currently intels u series is a step down from the 13-14th gen i series
There's BIOS updates for them, RMAs, undervolting, etc. Who wants to risk that though? Who wants to even be bothered by that?
I have a 12th gen and my PC is destroying games at 120fps 1440p ultra wide. On top of this it also happens to be perfectly stable.
With 13th and 14th gen you get piss poor manufacturing, unstable power delivery, short lifespan, wasteful. I could write a whole article on the shortcomings of these things and the trash service from Intel.
The 3060 is another story... LOL
I bought a Lenovo Legion with th 13th gen I9 and 4080 and don't see much difference in CPU power, but the 4080 made a huge difference.