what is best Rtx Gpu for 1080P ? rtx 4070 is waste ?

[Farzan]

i just don't get it , my gpu is gtx 1060 6 gb from playstation 3 era . when i watch benchmark videos from youtube unbelievably see no difference beteween gtx 1060 and rtx 4060 my gpu gives 45 fps in last games and rtx 4060 gives 60 fps 70 fps idk what is wrong here maybe i am wrong ? maybe they forget to set high performance power setting any way i dont like rtx 4060 but youtubers says its good for 1080P and i need a budget rtx gpu

so anything more then 4060 like 4070 , 4070 ti or good 1440 gpu or 4k Gpu or maybe rtx 5060 i s a waste for 1080 or they will give more performance ?

[wesnef]

Originally posted by Worldzworstgamer:

What is with people talking about 1080p still?

1080p is still over half the playerbase, according to the Steam hardware survey. That's why we're still talking about 1080p

Facts are we are in 2024 and we should be getting 4K cards that are affordable.

"Facts" are that the power needed to run 4k at a decent speed/quality isn't going to be "affordable" for many years yet. (and even likely not then, the way prices keep going up). 4k takes huge amounts of GPU power to do. Huge amounts of GPU power costs $$$$$$. That's "facts".


(disclaimer - I still run 1080p, because I refuse to pay $400+ for a GPU. Honestly, the $275 I paid for my 6650xt in 2023 felt like too much to spend just for graphics. The one TV in our house is also 1080p.)

[Dr.Shadowds 🐉]

Originally posted by WinterSolstice:

GTX 1080Ti is great for 1080p so I would guess it's equivalent, the RTX 3080 but I would go with Ti (Titanium) models - get a model with high VRAM (seems like somewhere in between GTX 1080ti - RTX 3080 will work great on 1080p/2k resolution as this 1080Ti can handle 2k easily). :csd2smile:

RTX 30 series, stay away from the 20 Series and 40 Series, especially from manufacturers such as Gigabyte, ASUS, and PNY. :badluck:

Good god I notice your post so late.

While 1080Ti is the GREAT card that still haunts Nvidia for being too good, the problem is that this is almost 8 years old, not only that, but the only way getting this is 2nd hand, this GPU more on par with 3060TI or 4060, the other issue that GTX 1080Ti LACKS the mesh shaders support, enhancement features, and the fact it VRAM is only 11GB. Also while may be good idea to go for last gen card for more Vram maybe more performance, and maybe saving a bit if buying 2nd hand, but you're playing at 1080p so this will depends on SAID game name how badly optimize the game will be, otherwise if have good optimize then what matters is raising the resolution which affects VRAM.

FYI VRAM of 3080 is 10GB, LHR has two type 10GB & 12GB, and Ti model is 12GB, which BTW 4070 is 12GB as well. So only reason you be looking towards 3080Ti is buying 2nd hand if able to get it cheaper than 4070.

There no reason to avoid either 20xx, or 40xx series, and the brands you listed are not a problem as you claim, the differences is aftermarket cards of modification to design, and components used.

[D. Flame]

CONCLUSION:

If you want a combination of high and ultra, and don't care about Ray Tracing:

4060 Ti with 16 GB of VRAM

If you want Max settings at 1080p, raytracing, don't mind spending a lot more, and your CPU is strong enough to not bottleneck it at 1080p:

A 4070 or one of its varients

Like a 13400F is a nice cheap CPU that works amazingly well with the 4060Ti, but it will bottleneck a 4070 in a lot of games at 1080p.

[The_Abortionator]

Originally posted by D. Flame:

CONCLUSION:

If you want a combination of high and ultra, and don't care about Ray Tracing:

4060 Ti with 16 GB of VRAM

If you want Max settings at 1080p, raytracing, don't mind spending a lot more, and your CPU is strong enough to not bottleneck it at 1080p:

A 4070 or one of its varients

Like a 13400F is a nice cheap CPU that works amazingly well with the 4060Ti, but it will bottleneck a 4070 in a lot of games at 1080p.

This is just terrible advice. Buying AM4 makes way more sense as the 5700x is not only better on average, has two more big cores than the 13400 but also let you have the option to upgrade to the 5700x3d~5800x3d later if needed as well as the 5950x.

That and the 7700xt and 7800xt make the 4060~4070 obsolete as you need to hit the 4070ti for Nvidia to make any sense to buy this generation.

[D. Flame]

Originally posted by The_Abortionator:

Originally posted by D. Flame:

CONCLUSION:

If you want a combination of high and ultra, and don't care about Ray Tracing:

4060 Ti with 16 GB of VRAM

If you want Max settings at 1080p, raytracing, don't mind spending a lot more, and your CPU is strong enough to not bottleneck it at 1080p:

A 4070 or one of its varients

Like a 13400F is a nice cheap CPU that works amazingly well with the 4060Ti, but it will bottleneck a 4070 in a lot of games at 1080p.

This is just terrible advice. Buying AM4 makes way more sense as the 5700x is not only better on average, has two more big cores than the 13400 but also let you have the option to upgrade to the 5700x3d~5800x3d later if needed as well as the 5950x.

That and the 7700xt and 7800xt make the 4060~4070 obsolete as you need to hit the 4070ti for Nvidia to make any sense to buy this generation.

You just misread everything. Try again.

[The_Abortionator]

Originally posted by D. Flame:

Originally posted by The_Abortionator:

This is just terrible advice. Buying AM4 makes way more sense as the 5700x is not only better on average, has two more big cores than the 13400 but also let you have the option to upgrade to the 5700x3d~5800x3d later if needed as well as the 5950x.

That and the 7700xt and 7800xt make the 4060~4070 obsolete as you need to hit the 4070ti for Nvidia to make any sense to buy this generation.

You just misread everything. Try again.

You giving bad advice doesn't mean I misread anything. Theres no reason to buy ANY of the 4060 cards PERIOD and the 6700xt, 6800xt ,7700xt and 7800xt are all options that make the 4070 not make any sense.

Stop being so wrong.

[Dr.Shadowds 🐉]

7800xt is par with 4070 only point matter is VRAM & Price point. The minor importance is Nvidia exclusive features that AMD doesn't have access to.

While both cards are at around $500 range, 7800XT is $20 ~ $50 cheaper with 16GB VRAM.

So if VRAM matters the most to said user needing that much then go for 7800XT, if want features from Nvidia then get 4070, otherwise save little more, and get 4070 Ti or better for 16GB VRAM.

For cpu why look towards 5000 series look towards 7000 get the x3d this way get the best of worlds, but thing is 9000 series that release has a performance gain that worth, but currently the price point what deter people for the moment until falls in price. I would say avoid Intel 13th, 14th, and ultra unless have a very specific reason that must be Intel that AMD can't do which is very doubtful what someone want it when gaming, or entertainment.

[D. Flame]

Originally posted by The_Abortionator:

Originally posted by D. Flame:

You just misread everything. Try again.

doesn't mean I misread anything.

LEL

Originally posted by Farzan:

what is best Rtx Gpu

Originally posted by D. Flame:

If (...) your CPU is strong enough to not bottleneck it

[The_Abortionator]

Originally posted by D. Flame:

Originally posted by The_Abortionator:

doesn't mean I misread anything.

LEL

Originally posted by Farzan:

what is best Rtx Gpu

Originally posted by D. Flame:

If (...) your CPU is strong enough to not bottleneck it

What a childish response. The RTX worship is not only pointless it hurts the very people buying GPUs.

If you want to ride the clown rodeo don't get pi$$y when called out kid.

My point stands.

[r.linder]

There's nothing wrong with RTX, if NVIDIA was giving the same VRAM capacities as AMD, or even higher capacities, then nobody would be complaining. Probably the biggest complaint on Ampere was that the 3070 had 8GB and it was valid because the card had more performance in it than what the VRAM allowed for while 12GB was pretty much wasted on the 3060, but they panicked, it was originally 6GB.

Literally AMD's only selling point for their GPUs is that they sell them cheaper than NVIDIA and they add in a little extra VRAM sometimes, they have nothing else to show for it and that's why they dropped out of the high end for RX 8000 series. They can't compete with what's coming because they aren't good enough at making GPUs as they are making CPUs, and that's why the best configuration you can get is with an AMD CPU and an NVIDIA GPU.

[D. Flame]

Originally posted by The_Abortionator:

Originally posted by D. Flame:

LEL

What a childish response.

"I didn't misread nothing"
*proof that you misread*
"What a childish response."

ROFLMAO

[D. Flame]

Originally posted by r.linder:

There's nothing wrong with RTX, if NVIDIA was giving the same VRAM capacities as AMD, or even higher capacities, then nobody would be complaining. Probably the biggest complaint on Ampere was that the 3070 had 8GB and it was valid because the card had more performance in it than what the VRAM allowed for while 12GB was pretty much wasted on the 3060, but they panicked, it was originally 6GB.

Literally AMD's only selling point for their GPUs is that they sell them cheaper than NVIDIA and they add in a little extra VRAM sometimes, they have nothing else to show for it and that's why they dropped out of the high end for RX 8000 series. They can't compete with what's coming because they aren't good enough at making GPUs as they are making CPUs, and that's why the best configuration you can get is with an AMD CPU and an NVIDIA GPU.

Whether AMD is better or not is entirely irrelevant. The OP asked for Nvidia cards, so that is all that matters.

[r.linder]

Originally posted by D. Flame:

Originally posted by r.linder:

There's nothing wrong with RTX, if NVIDIA was giving the same VRAM capacities as AMD, or even higher capacities, then nobody would be complaining. Probably the biggest complaint on Ampere was that the 3070 had 8GB and it was valid because the card had more performance in it than what the VRAM allowed for while 12GB was pretty much wasted on the 3060, but they panicked, it was originally 6GB.

Literally AMD's only selling point for their GPUs is that they sell them cheaper than NVIDIA and they add in a little extra VRAM sometimes, they have nothing else to show for it and that's why they dropped out of the high end for RX 8000 series. They can't compete with what's coming because they aren't good enough at making GPUs as they are making CPUs, and that's why the best configuration you can get is with an AMD CPU and an NVIDIA GPU.

Whether AMD is better or not is entirely irrelevant. The OP asked for Nvidia cards, so that is all that matters.

Yeah and there's a reason for why people more often than not want a GeForce GPU instead of a Radeon GPU.

My comment was a response to people like Abortionator getting mad about people with a preference for NVIDIA, particularly RTX series, explaining why there aren't more Radeon fanboys.