what is best Rtx Gpu for 1080P ? rtx 4070 is waste ?

[Farzan]

i just don't get it , my gpu is gtx 1060 6 gb from playstation 3 era . when i watch benchmark videos from youtube unbelievably see no difference beteween gtx 1060 and rtx 4060 my gpu gives 45 fps in last games and rtx 4060 gives 60 fps 70 fps idk what is wrong here maybe i am wrong ? maybe they forget to set high performance power setting any way i dont like rtx 4060 but youtubers says its good for 1080P and i need a budget rtx gpu

so anything more then 4060 like 4070 , 4070 ti or good 1440 gpu or 4k Gpu or maybe rtx 5060 i s a waste for 1080 or they will give more performance ?

[C1REX]

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

Początkowo opublikowane przez C1REX:

AMD needs Steam OS or Linux to make good APU that can compete with consoles. Windows doesn't support unified memory what is crucial for good performance.

I think that is where the winds are blowing.

These winds give me hope.

[The_Abortionator]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Χάρης:

According to some people, the RTX 4090 is a 1080P GPU. In other words, it depends on what settings you play besides resolution. If you don't care about Ray Tracing then anything above an RTX xx60 / RX xx60 should be enough for 1080P.

Nobody is saying this. If you need to lie to prove a point then you don't have one.

[Corona Scurrae]

Początkowo opublikowane przez The_Abortionator:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Χάρης:

According to some people, the RTX 4090 is a 1080P GPU. In other words, it depends on what settings you play besides resolution. If you don't care about Ray Tracing then anything above an RTX xx60 / RX xx60 should be enough for 1080P.

Nobody is saying this. If you need to lie to prove a point then you don't have one.

It makes sense if you were to enable path tracing. My 4090 didn't manage more than 50-80fps in cyberpunk path tracing. I had to disable since even vrr on oled TVs causes headache inducing flickering.
Otherwise that card is nigh impeccable if it weren't for the melting connector. Even with a powerlimit and a cap at 60fps that gpu is good in regards to efficiency and performance.

So to cut this short he is not necessarily wrong. Native res and path tracing = 1080p on a 4090.

[smokerob79]

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

Początkowo opublikowane przez smokerob79:

there is no gimmick to 1440p....it is better then 1080p.....i've had it for almost 10 years now....the reason its better is simple...more pixels without getting crazy like 4K were you need a new GPU every 2 years to keep up with games even running 60 frames.....

if everything was a gimmick you would still have horse and buggies.....

And 720p was better than 480i, but it was still a stop gap gimmick until Full HD 1080p hit the market.

4K is 1080p*2 and 1440p is just 720p*2.

so 1440p is a stop gap when 8k is already being sold.....wow.....

[D. Flame]

Początkowo opublikowane przez smokerob79:

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

And 720p was better than 480i, but it was still a stop gap gimmick until Full HD 1080p hit the market.

4K is 1080p*2 and 1440p is just 720p*2.

so 1440p is a stop gap when 8k is already being sold.....wow.....

8K is a gimmick, just like 3D was. 4K is the next standard that will be adopted. Because it is a direct multiple of 1080p, 1080p content looks good on it. Plus, until more content is 4K is available (like high quality 4K streaming and mid tier cards being able to handle native 4K), nothing larger will catch on. That will not happen anytime soon.

Ergo, 1080p is the gold standard until 4K is ready.

[Ontrix_Kitsune]

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

Początkowo opublikowane przez smokerob79:

so 1440p is a stop gap when 8k is already being sold.....wow.....

8K is a gimmick, just like 3D was. 4K is the next standard that will be adopted. Because it is a direct multiple of 1080p, 1080p content looks good on it. Plus, until more content is 4K is available (like high quality 4K streaming and mid tier cards being able to handle native 4K), nothing larger will catch on. That will not happen anytime soon.

Ergo, 1080p is the gold standard until 4K is ready.

8K is already an adopted standard. So is 16K. We already have 8K and 16K screens being produced and sold. They're just expensive. 4K was an adopted standard years ago. All 3 standards already exist right now and have already been adopted. 8K and 16K are also multiples of 1080p just like 4K is as well.

This is just a suggestion but you might want to take a moment and read to educate yourself:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8K_resolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16K_resolution

[D. Flame]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Ontrix_Kitsune:

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

8K is a gimmick, just like 3D was. 4K is the next standard that will be adopted. Because it is a direct multiple of 1080p, 1080p content looks good on it. Plus, until more content is 4K is available (like high quality 4K streaming and mid tier cards being able to handle native 4K), nothing larger will catch on. That will not happen anytime soon.

Ergo, 1080p is the gold standard until 4K is ready.

8K is already an adopted standard. So is 16K. We already have 8K and 16K screens being produced and sold. They're just expensive. 4K was an adopted standard years ago. All 3 standards already exist right now and have already been adopted. 8K and 16K are also multiples of 1080p just like 4K is as well.

This is just a suggestion but you might want to take a moment and read to educate yourself:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8K_resolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16K_resolution

I never said it wasn't "aN aDoPtEd StAnDaRd". I said that it will not be adopted by the general public, because it is a gimmick in the same way 3D TVs were. Betamax was also "aN aDoPtEd StAnDaRd" too, and you saw how that turned out.

[smokerob79]

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

Początkowo opublikowane przez smokerob79:

so 1440p is a stop gap when 8k is already being sold.....wow.....

8K is a gimmick, just like 3D was. 4K is the next standard that will be adopted. Because it is a direct multiple of 1080p, 1080p content looks good on it. Plus, until more content is 4K is available (like high quality 4K streaming and mid tier cards being able to handle native 4K), nothing larger will catch on. That will not happen anytime soon.

Ergo, 1080p is the gold standard until 4K is ready.

4k has been ready....japan got over the air 4k broadcasting in 2014.....8k broadcasting went live in 2018.....just because YOU are behind the rest of the world does not change the fact it has moved on......and betamax awas the better standard.....it had higher contrast better color range and more resolution.....the only gimmick is thinking your education was worth something....I had betamax in 1984 to know it was better....porn is the only reason VHS won.....

[Dr.Shadowds 🐉]

There is a diminishing return on resolution base on distance & size of display that affects DPI.

People talking about 8k is just not going be avg consumer product for awhile, even so going for 8k meant have intent to get a HUGE display, or else just wasting money for product that may not even be better that costs way more, or not tell any difference at all hence diminishing return if going for said sizes of display.

Can put side by side 1440p 24" to 4k 24" and may not even know the difference unless you focus hard which btw NO one will be doing when viewing content as intent to watching movies, shows, gaming, or etc...

So to make use of HIGHER resolution need BIGGER display hence the DPI, as pixels SCALE in size the bigger the display.

[D. Flame]

Początkowo opublikowane przez smokerob79:

Początkowo opublikowane przez D. Flame:

8K is a gimmick, just like 3D was. 4K is the next standard that will be adopted. Because it is a direct multiple of 1080p, 1080p content looks good on it. Plus, until more content is 4K is available (like high quality 4K streaming and mid tier cards being able to handle native 4K), nothing larger will catch on. That will not happen anytime soon.

Ergo, 1080p is the gold standard until 4K is ready.

4k has been ready....japan got over the air 4k broadcasting in 2014.....8k broadcasting went live in 2018.....just because YOU are behind the rest of the world does not change the fact it has moved on......and betamax awas the better standard.....it had higher contrast better color range and more resolution.....the only gimmick is thinking your education was worth something....I had betamax in 1984 to know it was better....porn is the only reason VHS won.....

And beta was still the beta, and it lost hard to VHS's Alpha

[Worldzworstgamer]

What is with people talking about 1080p still? Heck I was angry when people started talking about 1440p like it was something special. Facts are we are in 2024 and we should be getting 4K cards that are affordable. To answer the OP's question though eh you don't need an RTX 4070 for 1080p.

[D. Flame]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Worldzworstgamer:

What is with people talking about 1080p still? Heck I was angry when people started talking about 1440p like it was something special. Facts are we are in 2024 and we should be getting 4K cards that are affordable. To answer the OP's question though eh you don't need an RTX 4070 for 1080p.

4K is literally 1080p * 2 so that is why we are sticking with 1080p. Once 4K cards are affordable, 4K will replace 1080p.

[Dr.Shadowds 🐉]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Worldzworstgamer:

What is with people talking about 1080p still? Heck I was angry when people started talking about 1440p like it was something special. Facts are we are in 2024 and we should be getting 4K cards that are affordable. To answer the OP's question though eh you don't need an RTX 4070 for 1080p.

The way market been going lately isn't good since Nvidia keep raising the prices, AMD just following behind to corner the mid ~ high range, and games being pushed with less optimization needing flag ship cards just to get the best out of them at 4k.

[Ontrix_Kitsune]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Worldzworstgamer:

What is with people talking about 1080p still? Heck I was angry when people started talking about 1440p like it was something special. Facts are we are in 2024 and we should be getting 4K cards that are affordable. To answer the OP's question though eh you don't need an RTX 4070 for 1080p.

There is no such thing as "A 4K video card" or "A 1080p video card". That's just buzzwords YouTube influencers came up with. Anyone can use any video card for any resolution they want to. For Example: one of the recent new games, STALKER 2, barely manages 61 FPS minimums on 1080p ultra with an RTX 4090. 4K was 40 FPS minimums with a 4090. Calling an RTX 4090 "A 4K Card" is just silly.

[VioMeTriX]

Początkowo opublikowane przez WinterSolstice:

GTX 1080Ti is great for 1080p so I would guess it's equivalent, the RTX 3080 but I would go with Ti (Titanium) models - get a model with high VRAM (seems like somewhere in between GTX 1080ti - RTX 3080 will work great on 1080p/2k resolution as this 1080Ti can handle 2k easily). :csd2smile:

RTX 30 series, stay away from the 20 Series and 40 Series, especially from manufacturers such as Gigabyte, ASUS, and PNY. :badluck:

you have no idea what you are talking about, I have been building computers for 35 years and your information is not only false it is ignorant at the most basic levels, you should not be giving pc advice.