Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Whats the full PC specs?
They have 850W for around $125
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CC7R91V7
I wouldn't go lower then 850W
noctua nh-u12a (with stock fans) cooler
asrock b550 pro4 mobo
crucial t500 500gb m.2
crucial mx500 2tb 2.5" ssd
seagate barracuda 2tb 3.5" 7200rpm hdd
lian li lancool 216 (with stock fans) case
creative labs sound blaster z se pcie sound card
3x asus rog strix xf120 120mm fans
thermaltake Pure 12 Series 120mm fan
corsair icue commander core xt fan controller
g.skill ripjaws series v 32gb dual channel 3600mhz cl16 ram
asrock rx 7600xt challenger gpu (auto undervolt applied thru adrenalin software)
ryzen 9 5900xt cpu (on eco mode)
gpu and cpu were adjusted due to power draw after cpu upgrade being to high. pushing the rooms' circuit breaker limit. along with ups wattage limit being almost 2/3 of game power load with monitor, modem, and ps4 (turned off) plugged into battery. so need to get better ups. dont feel safe adjusting limit before alarm goes off.
gpu recommends 650 watt psu. can go to 850 watt since both have an 850 watt model.
asrock b550 pro4 is not very good for high end cpus
it cant deliver more than 150w to the cpu cores
if you plan on upgrading the gpu or using the psu in another build go with 850w
Not really any point overspending on a platinum power supply, especially in this case
thank you. while i can game for 20 or 40+ hours some weeks. was just wondering if it was worth the $40 usd for the better efficiency or not.
normally i would agree but money has been getting tight for me recently. with electricity costing $0.16kwh. was wondering if it would be worth it since i game at least 8 hours a week.
What's your full PC specs; a change there might make a difference. Like a more power efficient GPU for example. Or going Ryzen over Intel.
specs:
noctua nh-u12a (with stock fans) cooler
asrock b550 pro4 mobo
crucial t500 500gb m.2
crucial mx500 2tb 2.5" ssd
seagate barracuda 2tb 3.5" 7200rpm hdd
lian li lancool 216 (with stock fans) case
creative labs sound blaster z se pcie sound card
3x asus rog strix xf120 120mm fans
thermaltake Pure 12 Series 120mm fan
corsair icue commander core xt fan controller
g.skill ripjaws series v 32gb dual channel 3600mhz cl16 ram
asrock rx 7600xt challenger gpu (auto undervolt applied thru adrenalin software)
ryzen 9 5900xt cpu (on eco mode)
i'm not considering platinum but titanium.and no not uprgading cpu or gpu since i did that this year. i'm just upgrading the psu. only reason i want with a 5900xt over the 5700x3d is i do stream on occasion. sadly 5800x3d was sold out at that time otherwise would most likely have got it.
Paying extra for Platinum or Titanium isn't going to make any differences with a system like that.
Where it helps is when you actually are pulling like 1000+ watts from the wall (like an i9 + 4090) and need the higher efficiency for like 1000 watts or more.
Why they would even sell a Titantium 750W makes zero sense really.
Most Gold rated ones today are approx 88-91%
ok thanks. this really helped out. this was the kind of info i was looking.
At a full 750 watt load the difference between gold and titanium is 3%, which is 22.5 watts at most.
If both systems ran at full load for 4 hours per day at a nominal cost of 14 cents per kilowatt hour you'd save $4.60 per year and it'd take you about 9 years to earn your money back. It's realistic to use a P.S.U. for that long, if not longer since the warranty is 10 years, but that's assuming you don't need to upgrade above 750 watts.
However for one thing, you're more likely to run the system at half load for one thing. The efficiency differential increases, but the overall wattage drawn from the wall lowers, so you're not saving anywhere near 22.5 watts in that case. For another if you underestimate the amount of overhead you need for upgrades and swap out the power supply prematurely, you'll lose on your investment.
If you narrowed the choice down between the two, I would probably just say to go with the gold supply.
It makes a difference. Gold is 82 to 90 and Platinum is 85 to 92 depending on the load.[www.tomshardware.com] Plus he's talking about gold vs. titanium, not gold vs. platinum. Titanium is above Platinum.
Simple amortization calculation. Lets assume both 850W PSUs and your hardware would consume exactly 425W. Means both run at 50% load.
US Gold efficiency: 90%
US Titanium efficiency: 94%
Effiency = Eff.
Power pulled from Wall socket: AC
Power consumed by PC: DC
AC x Eff. = DC | / Eff.
AC = DC / Eff.
For Gold:
AC = 425Wh / 0.92
AC = 472.22Wh
For Titanium:
AC = 425Wh / 0.94
AC = 452.13Wh
=> The power consumption difference is:
472.22Wh - 452.13Wh = 20.09Wh
20.09Wh/1000 = 0.02009kWh
=> cost per year
Runtime = 8h/week x 52 weeks
Runtime = 416h/year
=> Power consumption difference per year:
Yearly power consumption difference = 416h/year * 0.02009kWh
Yearly power consmption difference = 8.35744kWh/year
Yearly cost difference = 8.35744Wh/year * $0.16/kWh
Yearly cost difference = $1.34/year
Now you can calculate yoruself how many years need to pass for ~$1.50 savings per year to make a more expensive PSU worth the cost:
Price difference / $1.34 = years neeeded for amortization