Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
i5 4th or 6th gen. (e.g.: anything up to i5 4430, though you'd be fine even with a 2500k, but why not the latest?)
8GB RAM 1600Mhz at least
Nvidia GTX 750Ti/950/960 - sorry I'm not up to date in AMD GPUs
Mine:
i5 4690 @3.5 (@3.9 Turbo)
8GB DDR3 1866Mhz CL9 Kit (Dual Channel)
1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm 64MB
Asus B85M-G (Gigabyte was out of stock - I wanted to buy that)
XFX TS 550W
Gigabyte GTX 970 OC
Everything on Ultra - Vsync OFF - 200+ FPS all the time (depends on map, but usually around 270-280)
A 3.3GHz dual core i3 will be fine.
It'd probably be some AMD/ATI R7 or R9 series card.
CPU wise a 3.3GHz dual core i3 will be fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYnItQXvPpQ
example i3/960 ^
Sounds like you've got some kind of laptop or all in one pc, not the best option for gaming but they do work at low 720p res depending on what mobile gpu is in there.
Imho, cs go isn't that demanding but there are limits, 1.8ghz cpus aren't exactly mid range and gt mobile gpus aren't mid range either more low end stuff.
You could always try it out on your 1.8ghz set up and if it's a fail build something new with an i3 4xxx or i5 or fx6300 with GTX960.
Anything more you will not see and is just making your system work a little harder than it has to.
150-200fps won't look any different than 144hz if that is the max refresh rate of your monitor
This is what causes 'tearing'.
Your input loop latency will also be at least five times faster.
E.g. At 300fps on a 60Hz monitor you'll get 5 partial frames.
At 288fps on a 144Hz monitor you'll get a much more noticeable 2 partial frames.
You're confusing vertical sync with horizontal refresh or scan rate, which is often 45,000 Hz or higher.
You can confirm this by filming your monitor at 1,000 to 1,000,000 fps and playing it back in slow motion.
My Samsung Ultra HD monitor has a horizontal refresh rate of 133,300 Hz. Far more than I'll ever get in fps at 3840x2160.
For reference I'm an Electrical Engineer and I design monitors and supplement the interface standards such as Display Port and HDMI.
It boils down to screen res ie 720p/1080p and how much $$$ you've got in the budget to throw at it. At 1080p the i3/i5 and a gtx960/970 or 380/380x/390 would all get you what you want in slightly different degrees, i5 4690k and gtx970 is a good target if you play other games as well, next down is the i5 4460 paired with gtx970.
If this is strictly for cs go and NO other games then ya the i3 4xxx paired with either gtx960/380/380x will get you what you want and a bit more at 1080p + you'll be able to play other games at a reasonable expectation of enjoyment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSM8b0cYY2I