Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
4.0 is only really needed for the gpus that have 8 lanes
For gaming 3.0 will often hold it back and has some impact on performance.
3070 has 16 lanes, its fine on pci-e 3.0
why the lower tier gpus are nerfed like that is beyond me
cant put a low end newer card with x8 4.0 on a pci-e 3.0 board without hurting its performance
Even the 4090 is fine on 3.0 x16, there would be more performance loss in the form of a CPU bottleneck than from PCI Express
so you dont understand what 10% is and the fact that going to a even newer GPU would make it a larger margin......got it.....
But in normal and most cases? You can just use PCIe 3.0 just fine
if you have a pci-e 3.0 board/cpu
a 2060s/ti @ 3.0 x16, would be better than a 3060/4060 @ 3.0 x8
3060/4060 are stronger gpus, will have higher high fps, but the lows and stuttering will be really low compared to the 2060