Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
I suspect ignorance and genetics. Apparantly some brains and eyes have trouble interpolating high fps. Where as others can percieve high fps.
But not being able to see the motion blur reduction, Thats just plain ignorance. Its easy to see when you know what to look for.
I still need a game where I should see a big difference like people claim. A free one or demo.
Instead record a video of your mouse-cursor travel at 144 frames-per-second. Record the video at 144 frames-per-second (or more).
If you slow-down the video, you can count the frames at which your cursor travels in slow-motion.
You might test it by using the same method for games, if you cannot see the difference. Simply record them at 144 frames-per-second or more. Then slow-down the video, to test if you actually have that frame-rate.
Even 60 to 90 looks like a massive difference to me.
You may not want to be using Steam for it. You should probably not be using Steam at all.
i can start to understand that statement at like 165hz and 240hz+
but if you can seriously not tell a difference, you might want to go and see if there is something wrong with your eyes. like really, that isn't a hackhanded joke or anything.. .
I recommend some light reading
https://www.howtogeek.com/888948/how-many-fps-can-the-human-eye-see/
https://www.healthline.com/health/human-eye-fps