Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i'd get the 4060 ti over the 7600 xt any day, as it's just faster
the 7600xt is basically on par with a 4060 (non TI)
also i'm assuming you are using USD?
for around 400-450 you can get a 7700xt
Amazon[www.amazon.com]
or
Newegg [www.newegg.com]
I would look for RX 6800 for $375, easily beats 4060 Ti and demolishes 7600 XT.
Should be able to get RX 7800 XT for around $450-475 too.
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/fcBzK8/sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7800-xt-16-gb-video-card-11330-02-20g
Unless your GPU is going to always be NVIDIA.
Cause if you had modern Intel CPU w/ iGPU then you can easily do well with using the Intel iGPU for video encoding. But if you will have to rely on dedicated GPU for the encoding, then you should always go with NVIDIA GPU.
I run an Nvidia 3060 12GB with a i5 10400F and the extra VRAM helps with many games especially when running higher quality textures via addons or mods.
define good fps. What fps are you getting now with that 1060?
I don't stream, but I've been incredibly pleased with AV1 for recording. Small video sizes, great quality, and I don't notice any performance loss. You get smaller video sizes and comparable quality compared to HEVC, and it's royalty free and has good support from current generation hardware and software now. If you're manually encoding, HEVC will be faster though.
This! I have this GPU with a very similar setup (same CPU and RAM amount/speed) to you and i can run all games on high to ultra settings with a modest FPS 50+. Starfield runs comfortably at 60 fps with vsync on at 60
Cant comment on the steaming side though as i've not tried it
I was on 1080p when I still had a 2070 and I remember experimenting with games like Starfield and The Last of Us which then were the latest games. I remember getting a steady 50-60 fps but this was only the first like five to ten minutes of gameplay. I didn't go any further, but seemed like a smooth experience performance wise.
So I'd say if you mean games like the ones I described then anything equivalent to a 2070 or faster should feel right.
Unless the games just aren't demanding. Like a 1060 6GB is fine for Tomb Raider 2013 but no where near good enough for GTAV or Red Dead 2
Yeah, I figure the same. 1060 is pretty old. Crazy. I remember the eras. I remember people not liking 2xxx series I think because of raytracing and prices starting to jump? 3xxx was covid/bitcoin stuff? 4xxx is purely price to performance increase being lousy?.
I think 1xxx was when I really started to get into self-pc building and using Steam. Only series I don't remember something bad with.
Forget the RT, the RTX do at least offer better raw performance anyways and the later support of DLSS 2 and 3 can be a big plus