安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
As for the RAM, can the system see all 32GB? If it can, you shouldn't need to fuss with trying to make the system use more, trying to force it via configuration is a fool's errand.
But you could always run something like https://www.memtest86.com/ just to confirm everything checks out.
id reset bios to defaults
and check msconfig, make sure ram limit is not ticked
Yeh, they are pretty common. I have Quadro equipped laptops from Core2, Sandy Bridge and Haswell.
Use steams "Artwork" feature and upload some screen pics for us to see what you are talking about. 6GB doesnt make much sense. If it were somehow limited to 3.xxGB I might think 32bit OS, but 6 would mean 64bit and anything 64 bit should see 32 as easy as 6.
Along a Bios & OS reset you might have lost the power & "green" settings, disable all power savers if you are to use this as a gamer PC.
Set your fans' curve to go 100% at 60C so you cut down heat early. Do utilize a large fan base dock system for cooling.
You don't need your screen set higher than 144hz, set drivers to 144FPS cap and replace v-sync in drivers with Fast Sync. Turn off DLSS & use Anti-aliasing and Ansiotropic Filters.
that is the only gpu attached to the display, the dedicated gpu has no video outputs
the dedicated gpu writes to the intel hd frame buffer for that to display
power settings and fan curves have nothing to do with available system ram
same with any of the other settings you suggest
laptops with dedicated gpu, the dedicated gpu has no outputs
but there are only a few laptops with intel 'f' cpu that only have the dedicated gpu no igpu
if he is using a ram/virtual drive, (system ram as ssd) windows will still show all system ram, and the ram in use by the ram/virtual drive software
The page file itself won't make your system crash. This seems like fear mongering. To the contrary, the page file prevents crashing in cases where a lack of a page file would result in a crash. Yes, files can become corrupted for one reason or another. That applies to anything. And guess what, it happens with or without the page file. Removing necessary or beneficial things because "they can get corrupted" is about as weak of a reason as I've ever heard.
As for "thrashing", you ironically may have more of that with it disabled.
Disabling the page file also may prevent you from using all of your RAM (or "running out of memory with memory available") due to the fact that your commit charge (due to allocation overhead) almost always outpaces actual memory use (and sometimes by more than you'd think). The commit limit is always the sum of your physical RAM capacity and page file size. So with a disabled page file, your commit limit is merely your RAM capacity. And since we established that overhead exists... well, it's seems there's good reason to have some sort of virtual room for overhead for that purpose. With a (system managed) page file, your system is in an "adaptable" mode and will be able to increase this limit if it needs to as well. But it won't set or use it unless it needs to.
Power Plan is one thing to check, High Performance plan should be used when on AC Power.
Make sure the correct NVIDIA driver is installed and not simply relying on the driver Win Update installed, in which case id DDU and manually install the latest driver.
Showing us a screenshot of what the Task Manager says about your RAM config may be helpful.
What Resource monitor reports?
The problem with "probably" here is that we're talking about system stability which can result in data loss if it goes wrong. Now that might only apply to unsaved data in the current user session and not data already saved on disk, but still, it's potential data loss that may or may not be a big deal. I'm not sure about others, but something like that is absolutely not something I find acceptable to be giving guessing advice about.
Why even guess when system managed adjusts it according the workload needs? This is what I don't get. System managed takes the guesswork out of it. It will adapt to your needs.
I don't understand why people absolutely refuse to let go of this particular placebo habit simply because they've convinced themselves it's an optimization, and it's wild. It's been decades, and in that time, there's been no data to back up that changing this brings tangible performance benefit. The ones that tried, guess what, they failed. They are margin of error every time. But we have tons of examples of the opposite; of what can happen when your commit limit is hit unexpectedly.
The other settings the OP changed (maximum memory and core count) are even worse examples. There is zero reason to change any of these to begin with unless you need to limit them. I can't tell you how many times I've seen someone upgrade a CPU and didn't have access to all their cores/threads, or the same for RAM, and it's because.... they apparently manually defined those values once upon a time? Why?
-The second option is system managed adjustments, which finds the balance between the availability of free storage space and the page file requirement. It is fine.
-The third way is you can let the OS use a fixed amount. The thing is even if you allow 100GB, it will use as much as requires.
Is this a placebo habit? The only example I can think of is like looking at the differences between a mouse working at 1000Hz and 250Hz pooling rate on a computer with a CPU that has at least 4 cores with HT. The difference is very minimal. I can see it being useful for laptops where battery life is important and low power PCs where performance is an interest.
Is it too low? Possibly. But I also can't agree with the 1.5X of the total memory theory(?)
msconfig, I don't see any reason what a person would do there, unless entering safe mode or disabling services. Windows will always use all available cores and RAM.
-The GPU is active. In nvidia control panel and task manager, it is clearly visible as active. Drivers are also up to date and games are all set to utilize the gpu.
-Power Plan, advanced system settings and game mode have already been adjusted for max performance, as I already used those to maximise performance prior to the reset.
-The symptom is that a game like Hrot is running at only 9 fps despite its frame rate being uncapped and on task manager the ram usage is stuck at a flat 6 GB.