Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I actually was sort of considering getting just a super wide curved monitor so that I could have just one big screen that I could split into two 1920x1080s when my work needs me to. That's doable, right? Switching between resolutions and screen numbers? Like I said, I've never done this.
edit: this is with a AMD gpu, no idea if nvidia does it better
Mine has two DP, two HDMI, and one DVI port.
I use them all on 4 monitors as the DVI cancels out one HDMI above it...
Two DPs (144Hz) for the gaming monitors and the standbys only go to 60Hz so one gets the HDMI and another standby gets a DVI.
I use a DVI cause I had more of these cables over HDMI - I am more into DP personally.
And NEVER EVER use a funky DP to HDMI hybrid cable, it will zap the ♥♥♥♥ outta your GPU.
For example:
USB Type-A Male to HDMI Female
USB Type-C Male to HDMI Female
Male side to Laptop
Female side connect HDMI male to male cable between adapter and display.
Now you can do Extended Mode across 3 or 4 screens if you like.
However, with that having been said, good luck finding a 3840x1080 res. monitor. Closest thing I can find are 3440x1440, but that would end up being like two 1720x1440 monitors. Maybe the 1440 part can be fixed with letterboxing, but your horizontal resolution would still fall 400 pixels short.
A 4k display is like four 1080p monitors sitched together at the corners though.
That's generally a suboptimal solution best reserved for laptops that've run out of proper video output signals. On a desktop P.C. with a free x16 slot you'd buy a second G.P.U. to achieve a similar result.
I'm just pointing out that those connectivity options aren't what defines a monitor because somebody else suggested they are. Why it was mentioned in the first place, you'll have to ask that person. I'd pontificate further, but it's a purely incidental point here, so it's probably best to just drop it.
I was replying to someone who was using a Laptop.
But to the OP; doesn't matter if you have 3x screens even; plug them all into your NVIDIA GPU. Configure each Display screen res + refresh rate in NVIDIA Control Panel.
those would be horrible, even for desktop
just plug the monitor into the gpu using dp, dvi, or hdmi
OMG I was suggesting that FOR A LAPTOP User. Please guys just stop ok.
This is my bad. This is what happens when others chime in with questions. I was never suggested that someone with a Desktop use Displays via USB
Horrible is an understatement. Try torturous on for size. Here's a U.S.B. A 2.0 to H.D.M.I. adapter.[www.amazon.com] Imagine a graphics card that only has 480 mbps transfer speed, and U.S.B. overhead. I've always heard those things were laggy as heck.
It's sort of a desperate man's last resort. They were made for people on business trips who want a triple monitor setup for productivity reasons, but don't have enough video ports on their laptop to do it the proper way.
Things got better with the U.S.B. 3 standard, in part because you had ten times the data rate, and in part because of Displayport over USB C[www.displayport.org] allowing laptop manufacturers to give you more video outputs without needing to fit in a larger separate connectors, making it less likely that you'd have to resort to such tomfoolery in the first place.
In which case you can use a ThunderBolt Hub that has DP, HDMI, USB ports all on it.