sudo apt install = sudo apt-get install??

[Murassa [TR]]

Are the same thing?

[Omega]

Both will do the same thing.

apt is apt-get's modern replacement. Use apt.

[Murassa [TR]]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Omega:

Both will do the same thing.

apt is apt-get's modern replacement. Use apt.

And apptitude does the same?

I remember a command like this existed for installing packages

[Omega]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย AS BAYRAKLARI AS:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Omega:

Both will do the same thing.

apt is apt-get's modern replacement. Use apt.

And apptitude does the same?

I remember a command like this existed for installing packages

Apptitude is a text-based front-end for apt. It just runs apt in the background.

[Crashed]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Omega:

Both will do the same thing.

apt is apt-get's modern replacement. Use apt.

apt shows a progress bar.
apt-get is likely retained for backwards compatibility.

[Talby]

I use "apt" when I need to install stuff and am on the console / remote ssh session, since it has interactive choices when needing to update config files as part of the update

I use "apt-get" for scripted automated package installation since it handles non-interactive remote installs quite nicely

[Omega]

You can use apts just fine for scripts. But when doing so it will warn you that it's "CLI interface is not stable" and that you should use apt-get. By this they mean that stuff might change causing your scripts to break.

apt-get which sees no more major changes to the codebase does not have this issue.

[Murassa [TR]]

Btw is modprobe installed by default on every Linux distro?

I need It for RAID

[Crashed]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย AS BAYRAKLARI AS:

Btw is modprobe installed by default on every Linux distro?

I need It for RAID

It is a basic utility. Of course if you have a third party RAID driver you have to compile it for your specific kernel, assuming it isn't in your kernel package already.