Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
The top fans and back fan are blowing air out of the case? The case doesn't look like it has a restrictive dust filter. With 3 fans out it should be pulling air through the many extra holes.
What cpu ?
How are temperatures at idle or watching videos?
The case has a mesh front panel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfXQQZtD_SI
Thats the problem. Need to figure a way around it.
from the video:
cpu torture test with tower air cooler (so no real gpu heat)
mesh front panel cpu temp 48C+ amibient (~18c) = 66C
solid front panel cpu temp 71C+ amibient (~18c) = 89C
Gpu torture test (so no real cpu heat)
mesh front panel cpu temp 49C+ amibient (~18c) = 67C
solid front panel cpu temp 62C+ amibient (~18c) = 80C
Air cooler might have gotten better cooling that a radiator in the front?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfXQQZtD_SI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUWVVTY63hc
The pressure from mounting a cooler onto the IHS will push paste outwards which is why a pea-size dot works, it spreads out. If you put too much on, excess will just get pushed off the edges of the IHS and just be wasted. It doesn't become an insulator like people and even some techtubers claim, there's very little actual evidence that supports that and they're almost always wrong in their assumptions.
The i9-9900K is a pretty hot CPU, and the ML240L is a pretty lack-luster 240mm AIO, a lot of air coolers easily beat it. I would have suggested at least a Dark Rock Pro 4 or H115i. Could also just be bad contact with the CPU IHS so it's not actually giving proper heat transfer.
You're also using a case that's fairly restrictive, so airflow is going to be choked a little bit no matter how many fans you have. It's an unfortunate thing, most case manufacturers really don't put much care into the actual functional design of cases anymore, they focus on aesthetics.
And if you can control the pump speed in Windows and BIOS (if it's a PWM connection to the CPU_fan or CPU_opt header) then make sure it's always at 100%.
If the cpu gets hot very fast like in seconds then part of the cooler that goes onto the cpu might not be on ok or thermal paste etc....
If the cpu takes a bit to heat up then stays hotter maybe the pump isn't working or something. Basically think water sitting on the cpu and not moving.
If the cpu only heats up under load over a longer period of time then case cooling or something. The side panel test should show this if it's the cause.
The new case fans are about 45 cfm each whick is ok. Higher airflow 120 mm fans might be very loud.
Theres likely videos of your case on youtube maybe see what they did and their results. Gaming usually doesn't stress stuff like torture tests so should probably get lower temperatures.
You can look at it this way: if the IHS can only hold half a gram of paste spread across when the cooler is mounted, and you use a whole gram, half a gram will get squeezed out the edges around the IHS as a result because there's too much pressure for the paste to all be on the IHS. If you don't apply enough pressure, then sure, more paste can get stuck, but that's a cooler mount issue and not a paste issue.
GN tries their best to keep their tests as consistent as possible and they've made changes to test methodology over the years in order to keep things both up to date and as close to 100% accuracy as possible. I always turn to them for actual in-depth reviews and no so much on just pure entertainment. It seems they're also starting to branch into proper in-depth PSU reviews, something that Jonnyguru hasn't done in awhile.
The PSU reviewer will always make mistakes due to unreliable test equipment. AC source and un-calibrated equipment is the main issue.
But if the reviewer wants to do a much deeper PSU review, then the reviewer will need special test equipment that is incredibly expensive and more difficult to buy.
Also, the Rigol Oscilloscope for my work is not my favorite because it has many issues and costs us more money than Keysight and Tektronix.