Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
plus many 3 gig GTX 1060 cards make use of slower GDDR 5 ram and clock speed
will it work ? .. it may ..but may be a bad experience
Recommended
Processor: Quad Core+
Graphics: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 or better
Additional Notes: Available USB (3.0+) Port required for Headset Pass-Through Camera
the GTX 1070 cards have 8 gig of V ram , not 3 or 6
That's a pretty absurd claim yet again made by you.
Blade and Sorcery requires a 1060 or 970 and recommend a 1070, so a GTX 1660 Super would be perfectly fine. Half-Life: Alyx's minimum is a 1060 or 580, GTX 16 series would again be fine.
For "headroom" an RX 5700 or RTX 2060 would be perfectly fine. You don't need a 2070S for high quality VR.
I didn't recommend the 1060 3G nor 6G for VR nowadays, now did I? No. I clearly recommended the GTX 1660S and above. Maybe you should read instead of slamming your fists into your keyboard because I disagreed with Kurumi's statement that a 2070S or better is ideal for VR, as if everything beneath it is far from adequate. He's literally content with recommending way overkill hardware for the task people are looking at doing, because he has no idea what overkill actually is. (For reference, he uses a 10900X and Titan RTX for gaming at 1080p with light work that 3600 can do.)
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1660S-Super-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1060-3GB/4056vs3646
My recommendation of the GTX 16 series is literally an answer to the OP's question, just rather indirectly (it goes without saying that if 6GB and 8GB cards are the recommended minimum, a 3G isn't going to cut it), and you made the choice to pick at me when I was merely making it known that Kurumi's claim was way incorrect when the recommended spec is more in line with a 1660S or Ti. If you want to complain about topic changing, don't do the exact same thing
Further interpretation reveals a miscommunication tempered by a foul tone, likely representative of previous negative interactions.
(An outside opinion).
To clear it up it is a simple disagreement about the 1060 being able to handle Blade and Sorcery.
A suggestion for the 1660 super was also made.
CPU: I7 class or Ryzen 5 class (non U model cpus, which are much lower class due to being low power cpus)
RAM: 16GB
GPU: GTX 1070 or RX 590, or better
Gtx 1060 3gb isn't even good enough for many games at 1080p, high or ultra due to being slower then a 1060 6gb (basically a gtx 980 performance class) and also the fact that below 4gb vram just doesn't cut it ever since VR released. Even many demanding non-VR games can eat up over 4gb vram at 1080p, depending on graphics settings.
So yea a RTX 2070 Super or 5700 XT are what's realistic suggestions today for VR