RTX 5090 70% faster vs RTX 4090 ?!?

[Raoul]

750W cards incoming or are they just going to show us some slides of a very specific optimised use case in a single program?

https://www.pcgamesn.com/nvidia/geforce-rtx-5090-performance

Edit: 675W*

[lsdninja]

We all know it's going to be too expensive to really care about, so why worry about it?

[upped_jetty_0o]

lol stop the hype train buddy it will be at best 30% faster in reality!

[_I_]

i dont know, going from 60hz display to 165hz is 175% faster
doesnt mean anything if the gpu ro cpu cant keep up

[Agent]

It probably will, it'll just cost a lot more to offset this.

[Bloody Moon]

I notice that PC gaming is exploited for the brainless, a bit like Apple, a practice on psychology, easy to apply, also with false marketing. But it is precisely thanks to those who give in to such purchases that causes the increase prices. The reality is that PC games are optimized like sh!t for the most part. A bit like that trash Cyberpunk 2077, more than a game it's a benchmark.
I would like to know what the real cost of producing these products is and how much the net profit is on them.
$2500 for a video card?

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

Not gone afford this monster anyway. I´m WAY more interested in RX 8800 XT, it looks pretty damn good so far.

[C1REX]

Originally posted by upped_jetty_0o:

lol stop the hype train buddy it will be at best 30% faster in reality!

Why not?
The 4090 is 64% faster than the 3090.

[GOD RAYS ON ULTRA™]

Originally posted by Candy Moon:

I notice that PC gaming is exploited for the brainless, a bit like Apple, a practice on psychology, easy to apply, also with false marketing. But it is precisely thanks to those who give in to such purchases that causes the increase prices. The reality is that PC games are optimized like sh!t for the most part. A bit like that trash Cyberpunk 2077, more than a game it's a benchmark.
I would like to know what the real cost of producing these products is and how much the net profit is on them.
$2500 for a video card?

Totally agree. I mean I could really do something cool to my car instead for that kind of money. Can't imagine what I would feel like after I bought anything that pricey for a darn PC.

I look at PC a little differently than most in the way I put together unique configurations with retro appeal, loads of looks and operating in quiet stealth. Follow that up with total functionality.

These new technologies have a problem; they don't offer anything appealing.

[emoticorpse]

I guess I'd consider it if I liked the games that came out nowadays, but I don't.

[Corona Scurrae]

Originally posted by C1REX:

Originally posted by upped_jetty_0o:

lol stop the hype train buddy it will be at best 30% faster in reality!

Why not?
The 4090 is 64% faster than the 3090.

going from samsung's garbage 8nm to tsmc's 4nm. ada lovelace is crazy efficient

Originally posted by Rumpelcrutchskin:

Not gone afford this monster anyway. I´m WAY more interested in RX 8800 XT, it looks pretty damn good so far.

I would wait with amd cards. rdna 3 was a bust and rdna 4 is apparently not what they wanted. I think rdna 5 or 6 is when they come back and can seriously compete with nvidia.

[Tiberius]

Highly doubt it. My prediction is its gon be around 30% uplift

[Sigma957]

Originally posted by upped_jetty_0o:

lol stop the hype train buddy it will be at best 30% faster in reality!

15% probably with software cheats.

[Andrius227]

70% seems like a lot. But maybe its with dlss which is very possible.

[C1REX]

The leaked numbers probably also mean RayTracing performance, which for sure will be higher than raster performance uplift.

[spicy little monkey]

It's not going to be 70% faster