Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I see no point installing another GPU unless you want to do compute workloads or need even more monitors.
Two video cards will give you a 50% increase in performance, IF IDENTICAL. Otherwise if one card is PCI-E 5.0 and the second PCI-E 3.0, guess which the PC will default to for BOTH cards ?
Sad that hardware SLI/Crossfire is no longer supported by GPU manufacturers offering physical bridging, which highly reduced MB & software work.
You could run Raid 1 on the 2 TB NVMEs for backup, the 0.5 + 1 TB you can use in COMBO mode aka not Raid where files are not split across drives but PC will see a 1.5TB drive instead of 2 separate drives. As for any HDDs you may have, I would make them external enclosures for backup purposes, again, if different sizes, combo mode. HDD functionality can never outperform USB 3.0 transfer speed at worst times, much less SATA 3.
I have two LG monitors with G-sync. I also have a Valve Index. My new MSi 4080 Super only has two DisplayPorts and two HDMI. So, to connect everything I will need to lose one of my G-sync and turn it into a HDMI.
G-Sync may be "dead", but I personally have seen improvement with the same computer running a game via HDMI (no G-sync) and the same game running via DisplayPort (with G-sync). It's not in your face noticeable, but it does make the game run a lot smoother with fewer rips and stutters.
I'm starting to understand that. I also took a look in my case. The new MSi card actually takes up three spaces. So if I was to try to install the 2070 as a PhysX card, it would be right next to the 4080, giving zero ventilation for the 4080. That would end up killing the card and possibly my computer. So, I guess I am just going to sell the 2070 Super. It is a Founder's Card, so it will be worth a bit more than what a normal 2070 would go for.
I'm still debating if I want to run the two WD 1TB Black's in a raid. For one, setting up the raid will give me real world experience in setting up a raid drive. I think that would be valuable, probably more so than the actual raid setup itself. So I am really leaning into setting up the raid drive.
Something else I am seriously considering doing is I have a 20TB WD cloud drive. It might be a good idea to do a clean install of Windows, update Windows and all the drivers, then save that to the cloud drive as a backup. That would make doing the clean installs unnecessary.
I do thank you (and everyone else) for taking time to give me advice. I am very grateful.
G-Sync is widely supported and actively being used. It's far from being dead but rather the complete opposite.
PhysX was NVIDIA's solution to enhance physics effects in supported games by using CUDA. it was quite a big thing in the late 2000s and early 2010s but now its flat out non-existent due to more effective solutions that were open standards as well. and since cards have gotten so fast. You would actually limit the performance of your main card by plugging a much slower one to function as a PhysX card