Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
There are reviews of both on YouTube so you can check them out.
Me personally I don`t like curved so if I had this kind of money to drop on monitor then I would go for ASUS.
Screen curve does nothing however, had one, detracts from the aspect.
Want a cheaper high performance monitor that has longevity ? - Spectre.
Acer is still around, might find something in their inventory.
The asus pg32ucdm is a flat screen that uses the same protector but being flat does not seem to be damaged at the same rate as the alienware but there are not as many asus screens out in the "wild" yet.
Here is also a direct comparison between the asus and alienware at 33:55 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gj9N9TZ5nlE
I personally went asus because of the scuffed screens issue hopefully i can pick it up on the 9th
Alienware is an option right now though and is quite a bit cheaper (around £400) which is why I considered that option too even though I wanted a flat screen more.
The curved screen issues put me off even further - I'll steer away from the Alienware then.
But do not get the MAG version that one does not support firmware updates for some insane reason.
I am considering the ergotron LX monitor arm in case the asus stand is slightly gigantic even if i would rather get the HX that supports much heavier monitors just to future proof.
The LX is around 150 euro's its pricey but very well made and will last many years maybe it would suit your needs aswell plus its available in white black or aluminum color so there should always be something to suit your style.
I might consider getting an arm just to save on desk space alone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w_3pzQcjfg
Monitors will require what is known as vesa mounting holes these days most have them but you should always look it up just to be sure.
The video above shows you the full installation procedure for the ergotron LX to give you a good idea on what is involved.
You either use a clamp system or you drill a small hole for the grommet mount but both ways are very solid.
The most important thing about a monitor arm is that they work within a certain weight range too light and the arm will lift the monitor up too heavy and the monitor will drop to the desk.
Its also not a product you should try and save money on because quality matters and my advice to anyone in life is that the most expensive product you can buy will always be the thing that was not worth the money, i bought a rtx 4090 at a scalping price that i am happy with but i also bought a set of screwdrivers for peanuts that where useless after a day of use that i still get angry over.
btw take my advice and wait a year or two. quantum dot nano rods are just around the corner
I am in the netherlands and the store i bought it from will have to handle the warranty so its not my concern.
Also waiting for future technology is just a way to wait forever im currently on a 144hz 1440p Gsync tn monitor that is 8-9 years old for me the PG32UCDM is a huge upgrade and by the time it will need replacing the tech of that day will yet again be a huge upgrade i would expect no risk of burn-in way higher brightness and HZ and who can tell what other kind of technological advancements will be available.
I always upgrade based on a list of minimal demands compared to my old monitor it was better black levels (oled has absolute blackness so that was easy) 4k resolution and 1000 nits HDR but granted the HRD experience is defined more by the contrast of brightness then actual peak brightness and again QD-OLED excells at this.
but the tech is around the corner tho. sharp presented their qdel displays and further divulged that they can use the lcd pipeline to manufacture them. qd nanorods are faster than oleds and also sport infinite contrast, on top of 100% rec2020 coverage.
infinite contrast and true black only matters if you are using your devices in the rooms with light control. that's why most experts suggest oleds for bedrooms instead of the living room.
hdr is a gimmick mate. hdr in photography makes sense but in media consumption? no idea. in most cases it's significantly desaturated and dull image with higher black levels and eye-searing highlights.
I have oled tvs and screens and never use dolby vision or hdr.