Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Правила и насоки за дискусии
Докладване на публикацията
it's just the first thing i thought of when i heard it was a gtx 1060 3gb
as the game uses alot of vram even on low, and performance drops off a cliff
when you run out of the stuff.
since you already bought the rx 6600 wait for it to arrive and see.
A large chunk of the AUD$399 I was paid was SFF tax. I had to buy the Sapphire Pulse variant because it was the shortest version anyone made (ASRock make a similarly sized XT, but that was outside the budget and harder to get). If I'd had a more conventional case I could have saved AUD$70 or so at the time and opted for the XFX SWFT 210. The 1060 I had only fit because it was the EVGA SC version, which I scored for AUD$200 in like 2017 in what was an absolutely epic score since they were retailing for AUD$500+ new at the time due to currency fluctuations and mining).
RX 6600 can render upwards of 60% or more frames at 1080p on average compared to the 1060 3G in popular titles these days, granted it's still a 1080p ~75Hz GPU for higher settings
Oh I haven’t bought it yet. Still information gathering! , so i can get a “ASrock” RX 6600 for around $330 CAD, a sapphire RX7600 for $360, or a MSI RTX 3050 for $308. The 6600 I was originally looking at is no longer on sale apparently. It’s a “power colour fighter” and is $370 now.
Does the brand that made it make a difference? Or is a RX 6600 the same no matter who made it?
Well those are the ones in my price range (under $400 with taxes) but I’m thinking of the three the sapphire RX 6700 might be the best?
So when it comes to picking a brand, performance shouldn't be a huge factor. Intangibles (like looks, size, shape, cooling/noise, etc.) are what will distinguish them.
The 6700 (non-XT) is a bit of a unique choice, presuming you didn't typo 7600. The 6700 was an uncommon and slightly reduced 6700 XT and instead of having 8 GB on a 128-bit bus (x600 series) or 12 GB on a 192-bit bus (x700 series), it's in-between with 10 GB on a 160-bit bus. Nothing wrong with this in and of itself; you just don't see it often (I wish nVidia might have considered this for their RTX 4060 series instead of dropping it from 192-bit to 128-bit). If it's notably cheaper than the 6700 XT and not much more expensive than the 6600s, then it's a nice choice if you can still find one.
Sapphire is the best quality for Radeon video card models, for Nvidia it was EVGA, but since they dropped out of making video cards, I would put stock in the Founders Edition models of any of the partnered brands now because none of them really stand out as much as EVGA did, they all have problems
Gigabyte has had some of the worst quality models with the highest rate of failures, especially on Radeon. They have similar sales figures as Sapphire for the same GPUs, but a notably much higher rate of RMAs.
The Rx 6700/6800 solve this issue by actually giving you a full graphic card that will use all 16 pcie 3.0 lanes. Don't get the Rx 6600 unless it's like $150.
Even then, the low price wouldn't hide the shortcomings of the Rx 6600.
The only one below that makes any sense at all is the Rx 6400, which would be too slow for your needs. But at least the Rx 6400 has more versatility being a single slot card and no need for a power pin.
But for you, I wouldn't go any less than Rx 6700 10g.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86pRe_GeT1I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f7NIeNEV78
PCI-e 4.0 doesn't make a meaningful difference over 3.0 for an x8 GPU, the CPU will literally make a much bigger difference than slot bandwidth. For x4 GPUs like the 6400 and 6500-XT, it can make a much more noticeable difference because that's very little bandwidth to work with, and then considering that a lot of buyers are using older and lower end machines to begin with for the most part, even more performance is potentially left off the table.
The 8700 will bottleneck the RX 6700 either way when it comes to some CPU heavier titles. But there's always a bottleneck and you should always go for the best you can afford, even if you have to put up with an older CPU temporarily because there's no point in choosing less than what you can afford just because your CPU can't do it right now.
it's the fastest of the three and has 10gb of vram instead of the 8gb on the other two cards
i didn't mention it as, they aren't sold here in canada for some reason.