Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i just asked microsoft copilot.
byebye
In the case of your NAS, assuming you have mechanical drives in it, the actual drives are going to be your limiting factor. You'll probably be in the neighborhood of 100MB/sec.
For reference on my laptop using a USB 3.2 Gen 2 port and copying a 7GB file from a local NVMe to external SSD I get around 350MB/sec. Copying that same file from the external SSD to the NVMe it was 540MB/sec. I did the same transfer to a NVMe in an external enclosure that transfer was about 700MB/sec in both directions.
You can get up to 2,000MB. However you'd have to have the drive plugged into a USB 3.2 SuperSpeed+ port that's running at 20Gbits.
If your port is slower, say 5gbit, you'd top out at less than 640MB. If you were plugging the drive into USB A (classic rectangle) assuming it was still USB 3.1/3.2 you're looking at 67-137MB.
And there's other variables too. There is a circumstance where you could hit 2,000MB. But if you're not using the newest fastest USB-C on your system you're going to be going a lot slower because of the limitations of USB-A or USB 3.0/3.1 or USB-C that's not 20Gbit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_3.0#3.2
That's not always true.
Just cause something has Type-C one end doesn't mean much if the other end is Type-A. It would have to be connected to at least USB 3.1 or 3.2 to get the higher speeds.
byebye
This is what I mean about people helping on forums. You either know this from actual real-world experience, or you do not. Online searching results are going to be hit/miss... a large batch of mix-matched info that's not going to be very definitive.
byebye
"DS220+ is a 2-bay desktop NAS designed for fast data sharing and
management. It newly features dual 1GbE LAN ports to support network
failover, and with Link Aggregation enabled, DS220+ provides over 225
MB/s sequential read and 192 MB/s sequential write1 throughput.
Data can be further protected with RAID 1 disk mirroring to prevent
sudden drive failure."
I don't know much of anything about NAS, but that's what it says on the datasheet. If that's somehow the absolute limit of what it can handle, then it won't really matter what SSD you use because the DS220+ itself is the main bottleneck for transfer speed.
From the Synology DS220+ speed was ok fast but no more than 160 MB/sec to 170MB/sec
Now the real amazing part, which is obvious, going from internal SSD to external SSD speed was amazing! 1 GB/sec + sometimes up to 2 to 3 GB/sec + :o
Makes me want to make my data drives in my pc SSD only even if only sata ssds.
That's because the NAS has mechanical HDDs inside.
So yea only way you're going to get those SSD transfer speeds is when connected to a PC where it has NVME SSDs as internal storage and you are doing data transfers to that external ssd. Again as long as that external ssd is connected to a usb port that supports such speeds.
Why wouldn't your PCs all have SSDs inside? It's 2024, not 2004.
byebye