Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
i dont think that your problem is that difficult. try c-mos or reinstall of your operating system. i cant imagine something else.
my2ct
The Ryzen 3 2200g only has 8 PCIe lanes available so depending on how you have things configured and what hardware you have installed you may verywell be limited on the PCIe x16 slot
But if you've may no other chances other than the GPU then I'd ask:
did you run DDU to remove the drivers before installing the other GPU?
did you install the NVIDIA drivers from their site before Windows installing drivers?
did you mess with anything in UEFI/BIOS during the change?
If you put the old card back in does it still show it running at x8?
1. yes
2. i had disabled auto driver installation from ddu so yup
3. nope
4. yes
EDIT: System reports x1,but the link speeds reported in cpu/gpu-z match x8,and GPU is a x16 but I think a GTX 1650 would barely reach the x16 bandwidth so very likely something is wrong with the GPU that's giving the system wrong link width readings...
I had seen a similar situation to mine in TomsHardware where someone's caps on the GPU for pci link readings just wasn't there,I guess I have the same problem....
But it works at the supposed speed when I do a benchmark and gpu-z also reports the correct link speed so I guess it's just purely cosmetic
So I assume X8 is the max I can get,unless I change to a non-apu Ryzen... (at least people say so,and so does my motherboard spec sheet[dlcdnets.asus.com])
And it seems like not having x16 isn't an issue,as a low-mid end GPU like mine couldn't be able to use the full x16 width anyways[forums.tomshardware.com]
also
backplate of my 1650[ibb.co]
1650 Vs my old 460,as it can be seen my 460 has twice as short PCIe port[ibb.co]
Also it seems like my gtx1650 GPU is a rebranded Galax (lol)
You'd need indeed a non Ryzen APU for the full 16 lanes.
How much you gain with a 1650, is indeed a good question, probably not that much.
Depending on the Ryzen CPU used that would give you a bigger boost than "unshackling" the GPU.
But to be honest, if using a non APU Ryzen, don't use the A320M chipset. The VRMs won't be able to cope and you'd either bottleneck the CPU performance, or even encounter system instability.
Now for the upgrades.... Should I just change to a B series AMD chipset,or would I also benefit from upgrading my CPU to something like an AMD Ryzen 5 3600x - 7 3700x?
And if sticking with AM4, why not something like an 5000 series or is that not within your budget?
not the mobo vrm temps
the board cant push enough power to the cpu for it to get hot with any aftermarket cooler
the boards mosfets around the cpu are cooking themselves
stock cooler will keep airflow on them, cooling them better than a tower or clc
cheap board is cheap for a reason
a chipset is limited to 2 dimm slots, a decent b board doesnt cost much more and most have heatsinks on the mosfets for the vrm, and probably a better vrm config that can handle 200+w to the cpu cores
i could afford a ryzen 5 5600x tbf
see here:
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-5600X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-3-2200G/4084vsm441832
byebye