Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
But 1080Ti doesn't support Ray tracing, that's a drawback. Now it's your choice.
in 1080p the 2070 is clearly better
in 1440p they are equal in Performance.
and 4k you aint going to do on such a card.
the 2070 also has RTX, the 1080ti does not
the 2070 is also newer sand still gets geforce game ready drivers, the 1080ti does not
one argument for the 1080ti :
the 1080ti has 11gb vram
the 2070 just 8gb vram
->
does not offset the other things though,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx-12wH3oGE
5 year old.
here is something more up to date :
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html
Both GPUs are outdated big time.
nah a 2xxx series aint outdated yes.. it's still supported by game ready drivers.
as for buying a new card..
1080ti sells for 200 euro 2d hand (used)
2070 sells for 220 euro 2d hand (used)
A 4060 Costs around 330 euro.. (new) and performs a few percent better than an 2070.
while also dropping poweruse from 175W to 115W...
Alternatively, it about equals the RTX 2070 Super.
In addition to this, the GTX 1080 Ti does not support mesh shaders, which may be a consideration in some games going forward. Alan Wake II is a current example. I'm not sure of any other current (or incoming) ones though.
If this is for most games recent or past and you won't be "looking forward" with it, I think keeping the GTX 1080 Ti for its slightly faster speed is fine. The extra VRAM may matter at times, or it may not.
Otherwise, if it's for future stuff I'd keep the RTX 2070 instead. If 10% is make or break you're on the edge of selling both anyway. Its 8 GB may not be great but with settings in check, it's enough for 1080p. Given it's an aged card itself, it wasn't an issue to have 8 GB since it didn't release with an amount too low like more modern iterations.
Personally, if I was ever comparing a Pascal to something newer and the newer thing was no more than 10% to 15% slower, I'd probably skip the Pascal. It's seven years old now. The GTX 1080 Ti hogs power for the level of performance it offers now, and it will lose drive support sooner. The only way I'd keep the GTX 1080 Ti is if the RTX 2070 sold for a lot more (I don't know if it does or doesn't) and you were planning to replace whichever one you choose anyway and the extra funds helps you do that faster.
Good advice.
Selling both GPUs will get him at least 400-450$.
Then, he can add $100 and buy a brand new RTX 4070, going for as low as $530 now days.
It will be lot faster and power efficient, also, he'll get a good resale value out of it in the future.
Otherwise, those 2 old card's resale value will be even more decreased in the future (if remain functional at all, after all these years).
https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=rtx+4070
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html
They obviously each have their share of pluses and minuses. I guess if this was my decision, I would sell the older one first so that you get better income. I mean: if you wait 4-5 years, you might get hardly anything for it. Keep the 2070 for now and as a spare during the break-in period of any new gpu. Then sell it as well once you're comfortable.