Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
An old Pentium III might be pretty responsive with Windows 9x and older software from that time, but put a modern operating system on it or take it on the modern web and it won't be as performant anymore.
It's a case of "built it and they will come". Hardware gets faster, so software can do more and gets more demanding. Some of that is more possibilities from faster hardware, some of it is less optimization since faster hardware affords more laziness.
Software vulnerabilities and the patches to mitigate them on a firmware/micro code level also impact performance, although it's not always to a large extent or in all situations.
It all adds up.
I can't tell you your Core i5 6400 is absolutely aged by whatever it's seen in the last five years, but on average, the answer is yes and that is the likely answer to some degree.
Also, hard drives are going to be awfully slow for a lot of tasks and that's almost certainly a factor here.
It will be a must to have the OS on an SSD though
It's important to keep your system clean and throw out all the trash. Especially virus scanners can have a massive impact on the desktop experience.
What do you mean?
That's not what that is for and the OS doesn't load any drivers or have hardware acceleration in safe mode.
an ssd for the OS in general, would speed that pc up quite easily, along with some maintenance, updating, ect.. (well speed it back up to what the hardware can produce).
also to mention, not only is the OS being slowed by the HDD itself, but it being filled also slows it down and its likely using the paging file on said HDD, which all combine into making it run bad and if the OS is running bad with a slow HDD, just imagine what the game(s) has to deal with on left overs for performance/running.
the very first versions of windows 10
used less ram and CPU usage, then the current one
security and feature updates
will have increased the usage overtime
by how much? probably not enough to realistically notice
if your pc is feeling slower then when you bought it
it's most likely down to how bloated the OS can get overtime.
especially if you aren't actively cleaning the OS every now and again
pretty much no matter how hard you try, the OS will slow down abit
overtime, it's why i recommend resetting windows atleast once a year (i usually reset my OS every 6 months)
lastly, having windows on a HDD will make it feel sluggish regardless of
if we are talking current patch or release.
Windows memory compression is an example of a feature that has advantages and disadvantages. You will have fewer disk accesses and higher virtual memory throughput, but this has an impact on the CPU.
Compared to what? Win10 even on my 10 year old PCs don't use anymore CPU or RAM really then Win7/8 did.
Even on my modern PC, CPU sits around all day long at 1% and so what if it goes higher, you do not notice it when it does. It's not something you feel. If you can feel the CPU usage with your inputs, you are doing something wrong; slow drives + too little RAM is what that sounds like. Or just a poor CPU in general.
Even on my 10 year old PCs, as fast as I can click is how fast the OS surfs through the various windows and such. At most you might wait 3-5 secs as it's loading stuff from online connection; like when surfing through the Microsoft Store app or something. Steam Client and the other game clients there are basically no delays at all and very little RAM or CPU usage to speak of either.
Those PC specs are ancient and should have been retired a long time ago. What would even be the point of turning that on? Let alone put Win10 on it.
Even in 2016 there is very little excuse users have had to have not already been on 16GB of RAM and at least one SSD by then for whatever PC they use.
There is the problem. You have it on a HDD. Move it to a SSD and you need at most 256 GB SSD for the job.
It's time to upgrade to a SSD. You'll never want to go back to an old harddrive.
You will notice a big difference.
If you are still using a HDD for OS, Steam or any games that are remotely demanding; you really need to just stop doing that. You're just hurting your own user experience in the end. OS + Steam at the very least needs to be on an SSD.
I feel like I should clarify for people. The one that's slow and still on an HDD is an old PC that I don't intend to upgrade as I already have a newer one on which the OS is on an NVMe SSD and all my new games are now on a SATA SSD.
The old is still an i5 6th gen, and has very little upgrade potential, not even being Windows 11 ready. I just wondered if maybe cloning it to a new HDD but repartitioning the C drive to have more space from D might improve the speeds a little.
6th Gen? It should have had an SSD when it was built.
Why would it need Win11? It's not like Win10 is dying anytime soon. Is 2028 not long enough?
I don't see why you can't get a 250-500GB SSD and put in that system and do a clean install of Win10 64bit 22H2
Then a format might be in order on the old PC.
Back in the days you had to format your harddrive every now and then because windows would get slower and slower the more you used it.
well im sure even a dirt cheap sata ssd would help much more than a new HDD and you can just move the games to the old HDD after you clone and format the HDD, with the OS being on the ssd, or 2 cheap sata ssd's for each.
HDD's also need to be maintained, with defragmenting and cleaning of old temp folders, ect..
HDD's imo are more useful as storage drives, but to each their own.
also, you could easily install win 11 on that, by bypassing the requirements, if you wanted.
got win 11 installed on my x99 platform and 2 old laptops from 2007 and 2011.