Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Always go with titanium.
Are we allowed to discuss these kinds of things? I don't want to go against any forum rules. I'm happy to talk about it, maybe this is not the right place though.
This is a Founders Edition gtx with the blower cooler.
OP: you might research the pluses and minuses of the mid tier 3000. There are four styles to choose from. An example of a comparison, there are a few others out there.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nvidia-rtx-3060-vs-3060-ti-vs-3070/
by this point I know I'm not upgrading anything else anytime soon, so I'm considering whether to save money and get 3060 or go for ti or even 3070. I was a bit surprised at how much performance 3060ti gains over the regular version in benchmarks
Yes, you would ideally want a CPU upgrade for something relatively modern and justifiably faster than the GTX 1080 you already have. A quad core, and one with slower per core performance, wouldn't justify something a whole lot faster than what you have now in my mind. Anything older than the 8th to 10th generation CPUs is where I would more call into question pairing the latest generations of GPUs with them, and I'm the opposite of someone who things you need to upgrade just because a bottleneck might exist, because they actually always exist; but the quad core era is just too slow enough in my mind for the modern mid-range and up GPUs that I'd be looking to replace it.
If you're looking to sticking to nVidia, the RTX 4070 is the lowest I'd look at considering your GTX 1080 starting point.
You should buy what fits within your budget and what gives you the best performance for that price.
For example, an RTX 4070 Ti is faster than an RTX 4070. But an RTX 4070 is also better than an RTX 4060 Ti, and the RTX 4080 is better than an RTX 4070 Ti.
So I'm not sure where "always buy Ti" comes in. You buy based on budget, but I will say this; I personally wouldn't want to have a budget that gives me the RTX 4070 Ti as the best thing. That's just about nVidia's worst value right now. And the RTX 4060 Ti has the same issue the RTX 3070 and to a lesser extent even the RTX 3060 Ti had; they're pretty iffy on having low VRAM and in order to fix that with the RTX 4060 Ti, you need to spend too much. Instead of choosing between 8 GB or 16 GB the thing should have just had 12 GB. So why choose an RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB when the RTX 4070 is so much better and not much more expensive? The Ti models are actually the worst value spots in the current generation.
These days they just fill the price gaps and are are part of the regular lineup anyway. They aren't even refreshes anymore like they used to be. That's the Super now, and those are coming soon.
I buy everything based on how things are built, strength, performance, and durability ratings, not budget - as I have unlimited flow there.
→ Different countries have different budgets but never assume.
Besides I bought the Ti for $300 lower than the standard models as these were limited binned. So idk what you are talking about as some Ti cost less even if they perform better...
So perhaps, depending on country, it could be situational as some countries prices are extremely high to where some people cannot afford Ti versions and designer clothing.
Have a lovely evening/day.
3070ti might be a bit of a stretch for me though
way out of my budget, which I barely have any of.
At best I'm looking to sell my 1080 and buy a used 30xx so my total spending is around $150-200
here's the thing: I bought myself an RTX 3060 laptop and basically it outperforms my GTX1080 desktop PC in most titles with DLSS support, while it's the other way around in everything else or when playing without DLSS.
So I'm not looking for a huge upgrade, just figured selling the 1080 while I still can and getting me the benefit of DLSS for the time being.
I'll be looking for a total overhaul in a few years down the line
Usually that's the case, but I can't help but raise an eyebrow to 3060ti's 8GB memory vs 3060's 12
No, the Ti models aren't "built better" as an absolute. There's basic and premium models for both and you're kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
Yes, the Ti models outperform the same non-Ti models. This doesn't matter, and I addressed why (they cost more). If someone's budget fits an RTX 4070 into it but not an RTX 4070 Ti, what are going to advise? That they only buy if they save up more for the RTX 4070 Ti or step down to the RTX 4060 Ti? That's questionable.
If you can snag any RTX 3060 Ti or RTX 3070 for $200 used I'd say they're fine. I was thinking we were talking about new pricing, where almost none of the RTX 30 series is worth it.
And yes, the RTX 3060 does outperform the GTX 1080 (as I mentioned, even the RTX 3050 sometimes does). But usually going up one tier worth of performance isn't too substantial, and the RTX 3070 has VRAM concerns that wouldn't have it age as well as your GTX 1080 did. You mentioned that as a concern, which is the angle my answer was coming from.
nVidia's VRAM situation is just... awkward. Let's put it that way. They're basically trying to offer as little as possible and when they get down to the x60 tier, due to how cut down the bus width is (especially on the newest generation), it's too little so have to double it instead. You then end up with one model that's really borderline on VRAM, or one with more than it needs that costs too much.
I'm trying to make up my mind as I go.
I almost never do babystep upgrades like this: my config before the GTX1080 rig was built around Radeon HD5870 in 2010, and I rocked that all the way to late 2016.
Today the situation is different, but witnessing the magic of DLSS and playing most of my games on a 1080p TV (or 1440p monitor), I figured ANY 30xx card will give me another couple of years
The GTX 1080 is fine for someone who wanna game on a budget, who does not care about RT/PT, and who wants just plain rasterize gaming performance. However, with newer games coming out that requires mesh shaders for better performance, the GTX series will eventually age badly over time.