How do you like DLSS3 frame generation?

[C1REX]

Is frame generation universally good, "why not" kind of feature? Or are there any downsides? I’m talking single player games while using a controller.
Anybody here on the 4000 series who doesn't like frame generation?

Thanks

[Sigma957]

AMD's Frame Generation works on both brands. Jensen's not happy.

[Pocahawtness]

引用自 C1REX：

Is frame generation universally good, "why not" kind of feature? Or are there any downsides? I’m talking single player games while using a controller.
Anybody here on the 4000 series who doesn't like frame generation?

Thanks

Depends on the game. I am not sure I would use it for a shooter, but for a game where I am more interested in a smoothness than accuracy, then sure.
I am playing Talos II at the moment. Very pretty game. DLSS 3 seriously increases the frame-rate, so you can play for hours and hours with the GPU barely getting over 50 degrees.

[N0REGARD4LIFE]

引用自 C1REX：

Is frame generation universally good, "why not" kind of feature? Or are there any downsides? I’m talking single player games while using a controller.
Anybody here on the 4000 series who doesn't like frame generation?

Thanks

I've never once used it and thought it looked or behaved weird. Latency isn't an issue since Reflex takes over. Tests have shown better latency with frame gen and reflex vs native output.

[Guydodge]

引用自 Ulfrinn：

There's a lot of things they could add to cards but save for the next generation or two. It's planned obsolescence of the earlier cards. Some people don't seem to realize that AMD and Nvidia aren't in the business of giving you the best gaming experience for your money, they're in the business of making business, so they'll only give you what you need to get people to buy the next generation of cards, and save the rest for later.

For those who have been building PCs long enough to see and understand it for what it is, we also have enough experience to admit that at the same time hardware has gotten more powerful, resolutions higher, graphics more "real" that the quality of games, and the effort put into them has tanked. We're at a point where we're paying more, and more, and getting less for it. Case in point, how much has DLSS3 or even ray tracing actually made a difference in anyone's enjoyment of a game?

you obviously dont have either ray tracing or DLSS3 it looks and runs great.

[Sigma957]

引用自 Guydodge：

引用自 Ulfrinn：

There's a lot of things they could add to cards but save for the next generation or two. It's planned obsolescence of the earlier cards. Some people don't seem to realize that AMD and Nvidia aren't in the business of giving you the best gaming experience for your money, they're in the business of making business, so they'll only give you what you need to get people to buy the next generation of cards, and save the rest for later.

For those who have been building PCs long enough to see and understand it for what it is, we also have enough experience to admit that at the same time hardware has gotten more powerful, resolutions higher, graphics more "real" that the quality of games, and the effort put into them has tanked. We're at a point where we're paying more, and more, and getting less for it. Case in point, how much has DLSS3 or even ray tracing actually made a difference in anyone's enjoyment of a game?

you obviously dont have either ray tracing or DLSS3 it looks and runs great.

Silly us and we though graphics cards were supposed to be judge on their hardware merits. Who knew software gimmicks would be considered on the same level as hardware.
I mean look at Alan Wake 2, it's a glorified software gimmick game.

[Monk]

引用自 Sigma957：

引用自 Guydodge：

you obviously dont have either ray tracing or DLSS3 it looks and runs great.

Silly us and we though graphics cards were supposed to be judge on their hardware merits. Who knew software gimmicks would be considered on the same level as hardware.
I mean look at Alan Wake 2, it's a glorified software gimmick game.

You judge a gpu based on its, abilities and dlss and frame gen work so well because of their hardware soloution not software...

Well I guess that is one way to announce that you don't understand the tech.

[hawkeye]

I'm dubious. I want every frame to be passed thru the full pipeline.

[Pocahawtness]

引用自 Ulfrinn：

引用自 potato：

it's a big performance gain for minimal loss in visual fidelity

So is just playing a game at 1080p, though, likely an even smaller loss in visual fidelity if you're coming from trying to drive 4K. It's kind of funny that the same people who have been trying to hype and sell higher resolutions, are simply repackaging lower resolutions, with tools, just do they can make those higher resolutions look as smooth, at the same fidelity as the lower ones... people pay more for literally the same experience now.

Not at all. The loss in visual fidelity with DLSS 3 is very small compared to reducing the resolution.

In my case, I started to use it to reduce noise and heat in games that I might be playing for hours and hours. But now I have used it, I really don't see why not use it all the time. It's something you need to try, before you form an opinion about it.